World News

Refugee Counseling for Immediate Deportation was Harmful


Two pilot programs that try to evacuate asylum seekers to Mexico and Central America to the southern border had many problems, including immigrant families who stay in prison longer than they should, young girls who have been in the same prison as older men, and toilets in places that had no secret.

Much is based on a report prepared by the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Homeland Security received by BuzzFeed News. The two pilot programs set up a final crash – the Humanitarian Asylum Review Process (HARP) and the Prompt Asylum Claim Review (PACR) – were part of Trump’s administration’s efforts to quickly search and remove asylum seekers from the border.

Under HARP, Mexican asylum seekers detained by Border Patrol supervisors were given an initial assessment of the dangerous interactions with security officials at the US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) within 48 hours, and the decision on inspection is expected to go faster than usual. . Another program, PACR, was designed similarly but focused on Central America who passed through Mexico to the US border.

These applications were eventually suspended during corona virus plague, since supervisors have chosen instead of immediately changing those who want to be rescued, including children, at the border.

DHS officials did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Investigators looked into their interrogation in the El Paso area, where they found many problems with flight programs, including families who had been in Border Patrol prison for more than a week, over 72 hours of inmates being detained in CBP prison.

The researchers, however, confirmed the lack of confidentiality in border areas.

The report said large rooms at the site had led to CBP officials fighting for incarceration: those who regulate family ties while also requiring the separation of women and children from unaccompanied men. CBP officials supported various families together, and as a result, women and girls in prison were being held by men and boys who were not their relatives.

“We found that CBP binds many families together in large open cells in El Paso [Central Processing Center] with no guarantee of secrecy or segregation of dissenting teens and adults, ”states the report. In one room, two 14-year-old girls were arrested by nine unarmed men.

“Toilets in the area with waist-deep sections did not provide a secret,” and there were no “breastfeeding areas,” although there were women with infants. CBP officials set up a guard to supervise the detainees, and there were no complaints from the family.

CBP officials, according to the report, tried to create a “non-oppressive” environment for children incarcerated.

“CBP has created playgrounds in every cell, with beautiful and playful mats. CBP officials say they have concrete pillars in the prison to protect children walking around,” the report added, contrasting the experience with a family-run shelter. ICE with outdoor recreation, fitness equipment, sports, and technical opportunities.

Border officials did not make it clear that the program was going well, supervisors wrote. According to the report, CBP had two PACR screening tests and none of HARP. There was no evidence that the agency intended to enforce the policy after a review of its effectiveness, and, however, there were no objectives that CBP provided to border controls to see its effectiveness in the first place.

Staff at CBP had a hard time giving confidentiality to immigrants to speak for themselves to legal advisers and government officials. USCIS officials have told officials that many foreigners do not understand the meaning of lawyers and that CBP officials find it difficult to provide them with phones.

In the face of fearful interrogation, those seeking to be rescued must show that there is a possibility that they are afraid of being persecuted in their own country. By leading the interview, immigrants use their time in prison to consult with lawyers or others to help them prepare for their trial.

As a result, only a handful of these groups were able to communicate at baseline: 19% PACR and 29% HARP.

The Inspector General’s report was temporary, with supervisors planning to test all other border areas in the future.


Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Back to top button