World News

Ordinance on Indonesian criminal offenses was changed – again | Natural Issues

Jakarta, Indonesia – Indonesians are still reeling from the aftermath of a series of high-profile cases involving blacksmiths in Jakarta after judges postponed a second election in two months.

The citizen case was filed in 2019 that calls on the Indonesian government to answer charges of embezzlement in the Indonesian capital.

At the time of writing, the 32 plaintiffs cited in the case also demanded that the authorities be compelled to raise the city’s air – which is always dangerous according to air indexes – through strict laws and penalties.

The case has been marred by delays in recent months. The plaintiffs were awaiting sentencing on May 20, before the judges handed down the first verdict until June 10. On Thursday, it was rescheduled – until June 24.

At a hearing in the Central Jakarta High Court, Chief Justice Saifuddin Zuhri criticized the amount of documents kept in the case of delays, and told the court that a three-judge panel needed more time to read all the official documents.

“I hope you will agree that today we cannot read the verdict. As a result, we have agreed not to postpone the election for two weeks, ”he said during a three-minute hearing, which was reviewed in public via Zoom due to coronavirus rules.

In a statement issued by the Clean Air Initiative Coalition, which is made up of plaintiffs in civil cases and their support group, the plaintiffs’ lawyer, Ayu Eza Tiara, said he was shocked and disappointed.

“Reading a sentence that lasts eight weeks is not something that would seem logical,” he said. “This delay is a clear indication of timelessness … as well as a breach of the concept of quick, easy and inexpensive testing.

“If we say ‘justice is too late, justice is too late’ … a slow judgment will not give justice to the parties. That is why we hope the judges will not delay in the future.”

Proponents of her case have been working to make the actual transcript of this statement available online. Proponents of her case have been working to make the actual transcript of this statement available online. A court filed in 2019 wants the government to prosecute them for air pollution in Jakarta [File: Bay Ismoyo/AFP]

‘Critical debate’

One of the 32 co-defendants, Elisa Sutanudjaja, told Al Jazeera that the repeated delays only strengthened the foundation of the case.

“As far as I’m concerned, the suspension is another piece of evidence that air pollution and climate change are not very important in the state, and even the courts do not consider clean air necessary,” he said.

The case has been controversial since its adjudication in 2019, among other things, the defendants include the President of Indonesia, the Minister of Environment and Forestry, the Minister of Housing, the Jakarta Embassy and the Banten and West Java provinces.

The judges should also question the legitimacy of Jakarta, with Jakarta’s ambassador to the state, Anies Baswedan, even criticizing those responsible for the city’s black smoke.

Istu Prayogi, who previously told Al Jazeera that he was found to have spots in his lungs and suffered from headaches and confusion while living in Jakarta in the 1990s, said he felt the court was using legal means to prevent a decision.

“These are the cases we are expecting in Indonesia,” he said. “The judges were supposed to give the verdict, but because they had the opportunity to not delay, they used the opportunity to buy time.”

Some observers have wondered if a panel of three judges has been remanded in custody pending trial.

Indonesian law follows state law, and applies to a combination of Dutch law, customary law and modern Indonesian law. There are no courts in Indonesia and all decisions, in both civil cases and cases, are decided by a panel of judges.

“The length of the verdict and the repeated delays make us doubt whether there is a strong dispute between the judiciary over whether they should be a healthy side or continue to allow Jakartans to breathe polluted air,” said Dwi Sawung, Energy and Urban Campaign Director of the Indonesian Forum for the Environment (WALHI) , he said in a statement.

“However, people are eagerly awaiting the judges’ decision to ensure the future of the fresh air we breathe in Jakarta.”

Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Back to top button