Last Thursday a a large part of Russia’s main airport, Nauka, finally arrived at the port with the International Space Station after a series of difficult trips to the surrounding laboratory. However, the problems did not end there. About three hours after contacting the station, Nauka started firing on his bus, throwing the place.
This prompted NASA Mission Control in Houston to launch “mind-boggling” solutions for the station, emergency commanders and pilot pilots. Later, in conjunction with the Moscow air traffic controllers, the teams ordered the station to burn down the pilots’ part of the Russian space station, as well as the advanced car to the laboratory. This merger prevented the station from collapsing further until Nauka completed its first fuel.
Following the missions, NASA immediately convened a press conference and made a public appearance to the media, including senior pilot Kathy Lueders and International Space Station program director Joel Montalbano. Both say that NASA and the Russian space company, Roscosmos, had successfully handled the situation and reduced the overall risk to the station and its allies.
However, he answered many questions about artefacts in Roscosmos, which has provided a variety of information. Vladimir Solovyov, an elder in Roscosmos, He said this in a government statement, “As a result of a temporary software failure, the direct command was incorrectly modified to enable the module engines to shut down, which resulted in the change not being fully visible.”
This makes the problem sound like a faulty program. But later, Roscosmos chief Dmitry Rogozin admitted that someone on the ground could be wrong. “Everything was going well, but there were human needs,” he told a Russian press release. according to Reuters. “There was excitement (when he arrived safely at the port), everyone was relieved.”
Now that the tragedy has passed, what worries me the most is that this has never happened and that could mean Russia’s continued success in the International Space Station program. For NASA, the ultimate goal is for humans to remain in the Earth’s crust, and that means the space shuttle for the rest of 2020.
Since the potential for unofficial Nauka shooting also affects human error, this will be the third major problem in less than three years due to negligent activities. In October 2018, the appointment of Russian cosmonaut Aleksey Ovchinin and NASA astronaut Nick Hague was canceled after Soyuz failed to support, and the crew had to return to Earth immediately. Subsequent research he found that the connector mounted on the side was mixed illegally to the center of the Soyuz rocket.
About the same time, Russia has announced that there is a small hole in another Soyuz car, already connected to the International Space Station. “We can reduce the cause of the error and technicality,” Rogozin said of vutoli.
The technical errors occurred when Roscosmos struggled to pay their engineers and technicians a living wage. And now the space budget is facing another setback because NASA no longer needs to buy Soyuz seats for its astronauts to fly to the International Space Station – thanks to SpaceX’s Crew Dragon car and, hopefully soon, the Boeing Starliner.
Despite all of this, NASA remained a public spectacle of Russia and its space program. And it should be noted that, in spite of its many challenges when it comes to the station, Nauka is now available and working. This is important because perhaps binding Participate in Russia at the next level for the next ten years.
There is no proof of this. In recent months Russian authorities have begun to speculate that Roscosmos’ weapons, most of which are more than 20 years old, are very old. Russian people he added could come out of the program in 2025 and create a new station. In fact, just Saturday, two days after Nauka’s rough port, Roscosmos released a document stating that it was continuing to learn of a new project in the low-lying Earth Earth called the Russian Orbital Service Station. This seems to be a good thing, since Russia does not have the budget or the capacity to build new facilities.
Source link
