World News

US Supreme Court to hear ‘government secrets’ case on Muslim watchdog | Court Matters

The Supreme Court has ruled in favor of the second “state secrets” if the FBI’s anti-Muslim attacks continue.

The Supreme Court of the United States has agreed to decide whether the case could go ahead with the California Muslim community The FBI is fighting they watch over them because of their religion.

It is the second case in which a court has ruled in favor of a so-called “secrets of the state”, the idea that the government could prevent the release of information that would threaten national security if it were disclosed.

This is due to a 1953 U.S. lawsuit against Reynolds which he witnessed Supreme Court promote state secrecy opportunities after widows of three men who died in a plane crash sought crash reports to sue the US government. The government stressed that releasing the reports would jeopardize national security.

As usual, the court has not yet commented on Monday, saying it will file the case, which is expected to be heard after the summer recess in October.

In other secret criminal cases, the judges have admitted that they have ruled in favor of a Palestinian man captured after September 11 threats and was detained in a U.S. prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, can access information that the government sets as government secrets.

Often, this opportunity is requested in government suits. The cases are dismissed when the plaintiff is denied access to valuable information, which is often required for the case to proceed.

Judges cannot read much of this information, even in private.

The court’s verdict on Monday concerns three Muslims living in Southern California who from 2006 to 2007 the FBI paid confidentiality to secretly collect Muslims in Orange County, California, based on their religion.

The district court dismissed the case on condition of anonymity. The court ruled that continuing the case “is at risk of disclosing secrets”. However, the appellate court reversed the decision.

The San Francisco Court of Appeals ruled that the government’s privacy policy did not exceed the 1978 Intelligence Surveillance Act, Bloomberg reporters say.

The law allows the judge to reconsider his or her dispute in a court hearing to determine if the suit is appropriate.

The FBI has done it long-term criticism under his supervision We are not Muslims in the US. Al Jazeera investigated how Muslims view anti-terrorism activities in the 2014 “Informants” document.

Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Back to top button