World News

Twitter suspends hundreds of accounts supporting Marcos in the Philippines | Stories

Twitter claims to have used social media and technology to decide to suspend more than 300 accounts and hashtags.

Twitter has suspended hundreds of accounts promoting Philippine Presidential candidate Ferdinand Marcos Jr., which they say violates spam and fraud laws.

Former politician Marcos, 64, son of The late leader was overthrown in 1986 the “people power” emerged as the leader ahead of the May vote.

Twitter said it used social media and expertise to decide to suspend more than 300 accounts and hashtags, adding that its research was ongoing.

“We will be vigilant to identify and remove any doubts that people may have about the election,” a Twitter spokesman said.

Marcos ‘chief of staff, Vic Rodriguez, praised Twitter for his work but stressed that there was no guarantee that all accounts were for Marcos’ supporters.

“We thank Twitter for monitoring the fraud of the platform, spam and other attempts to disrupt public discussions,” he said in a statement.

Marcos’ family is still one of the elderly heavier and more powerful forces in Philippine politics, they have served as senators, legislators and provincial governors for the past three decades.

Great media connection

Even Marcos Jr., better known as “Bongbong”, is powerful opponents in politics, he enjoys many followers at home and abroad from the Philippines, who make extensive use of television.

This use, according to many, has made it possible for the Philippine political issues to be changed through television.

Twitter on Monday said it was developing a test feature that allows users to post fake content including the Philippines, Brazil and Spain.

The Rappler news agency this week reported that Marcos’ followers want to take control of Twitter through accounts that have been set up for short periods of time. Twitter recognized the report and said most of the 300 accounts had been removed in the past as they always do.

Twitter said sharing politics or encouraging people to do this through hashtags is in its law, unless the accounts were accurate, self-made or paid, but “did not see any clear evidence” of this.

Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Back to top button