World News

The new draft of COP26 promotes the banning of coal, prompt climate action | Weather Problems

The UN Climate Summit document calls for the expulsion of ‘crude coal’ and ‘insufficient’ oil, as negotiators work harder to secure a partnership.

Participants in this year’s United Nations climate summit are looking for new ideas aimed at signing a treaty that could be said to promote efforts to combat global warming.

British officials leading the COP26 talks in Glasgow, Scotland, released new agreements on Saturday after telling delegates from nearly 200 countries at the end of Friday to go for a break as the deadline passed.

The ideology of the Supreme Court still maintains a rhetorical rhetoric that calls on countries to accelerate “efforts to address the immovable power of coal and the shortage of fossil fuels”.

A new addition, the text says, states that countries will recognize the “importance of promoting sustainable change” – meaning calls from those working in the oil industry for financial assistance as they reduce jobs and businesses.

But it has failed to allocate dedicated funds primarily to the deteriorating and waste-fed – rising global warming to date – instead reiterating the “speed of action and support” of vulnerable and poor countries.

It also said it was “very sad” that rich countries also failed to get the $ 100bn they had promised a decade ago, but only said it would reach 2023.

UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson said on Friday that he believed “positive results were being seen” in the two-week talks, which are now extending time.

In a sense, countries are “encouraged” to set new goals for reducing 2035 and 2025 emissions, by 2040 and 2030, a five-year target. Originally, developing countries were expected to do so every 10 years.

Scientists say the world is not progressing well enough to achieve the Paris agreement of 2015 by reducing global temperatures by 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 Fahrenheit) by the end of this century compared to the pre-industrial era.

Al Jazeera’s Andrew Simmons, a report from Glasgow, said the documents published on Saturday looked “good” but said all delegates should agree to sign a contract.

“The way things are organized is following this pattern [an informal] “We are looking forward to what the future holds,” he said.

“Then on Saturday, the process will have all the discussions and we will see the actual agreements made, and the idea is to end the meeting sometime on Saturday afternoon.”

“The light will be, yes, there will be progress but [it remains to be seen] whether this sounds like a real success, “he added.

Tracy Carty, chief of Oxfam COP26 representatives, said in a statement that the agreement was “still incomplete”.

“We want the strongest results to ensure that governments return next year with mitigation targets that can keep 1.5 degrees alive. And a steady economic growth will help countries adapt to the devastating and devastating effects that have continued,” Carty said.

“It is a matter of grave concern that the notion of developing countries’ view of economic damage and degradation has not been included in this new policy.”

Juan Pablo Osornio, chief of the Greenpeace COP26 delegation, also expressed concern that the alliance was not enough to tackle the climate crisis.

“The language in the previous words about the depletion of coal and the depletion of fossil fuels was much stronger than what we see here,” he told Al Jazeera.

He added that while recent publications also include the amount of “insufficient” fuel costs, “they leave less space to do as much as you can”.

Osornio said the details of the revised treaty should be carefully considered and that the confidence of many developing countries was lost after rich countries failed to meet the promise of $ 100bn a year for developing countries to adapt to climate change.

“It will be the most exciting meeting in the history of the COPs,” he said. “It’s a high-risk game that a [COP26] the president is playing, releasing a lot of text [to a vote]. ”




Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Back to top button