[ad_1]
In the north of the world, the coming winter has raised concerns about COVID-19, with several countries raising awareness of the high number of cases and warning of increased medical services.
This prompted Austria, a small EU country where the risk of infection to close to 15,000 daily in mid-November, to opt for a nuclear option – not only did the three-week shutdown, but also made the vaccine acceptable to adults since February 2022. of the global vaccine, which currently stands at 66 percent.
The recent release of the alarming version of COVID-19, Omicron, also urged governments to take immediate action before their health systems fail. With its surprisingly high turnover, Omicron variability could mean the rapid spread and rejection of our current vaccine. Unfortunately, preliminary research from South Africa suggests that vaccines and exercise regimens should continue to provide safety in the hospital or beyond. In addition, modern development and production methods should allow for the development of modified vaccines within a few months and not years.
But many developed countries where vaccinations are readily available have seen little response. EU members in Romania and Bulgaria, for example, have a vaccine of up to 40 percent of their population. Dr Anthony Fauci, senior medical adviser to the President of the United States, believes that permanent human security can only be achieved if about 90 percent of the population is abducted.
Therefore, in an effort to reduce the risk posed by the growing number of cases and the spread of Omicron, governments are introducing new vaccination programs in their respective countries.
The political strategy of requiring vaccination passports and shops, and making the lives of uncircumcised people banned, has already been used throughout Europe, though it has sparked major protests in many countries, including Italy, Croatia and the Netherlands.
As a result, policymakers in many countries may be tempted to follow Austria’s lead and introduce new vaccine laws soon to reduce hospitalization and avoid serious financial damage. EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has already called for a formal vaccination debate and the new German Chancellor, Olaf Schulz, has also said he supports vaccination activities.
However, government regulations can have far-reaching consequences – they can lead to unrest, escalate mistrust of government, and damage communities such as the plague.
In Austria, a draft law stipulates that those who are not freed will be “summoned” by other authorities and will eventually be fined 3,600 euros (approximately $ 4,060). With millions of people still being circumcised, it will not be long before most Austrians are criticized. Thousands of Austrians have been protesting in the past, accusing the government of breaking the law.
Many people who are reluctant to take the COVID-19 vaccine are less likely to be loud, unresponsive to anti-vaxx worries that are planted with tracker chips via jab. Most of them are interested in starting something new in their bodies, or just want to understand the dangers and benefits of a good jab. But vaccine control can change this. If governments provide vaccinations to people who are skeptical of vaccinations, they may be at risk of false news or conspiracy theories, and eventually join the anti-vax movement.
Instead of imposing the vaccine on people, policymakers should try to understand why people may be reluctant to accept it, and focus on their efforts to change attitudes. This may help to administer long-term vaccination, which may be important especially if additional COVID-19 vaccines are needed.
When government opinion becomes necessary, it shifts power between government and the individual. Government-regulated regimes sound disgusting, even though their intentions are well-intentioned. This is why even the World Health Organization (WTO) has warned against using the COVID vaccine, unless every possible means has been tried to get people vaccinated.
Vaccine control may undermine trust in organizations, which may reduce vaccination rates. Lesson on the issue of vaccines in Europe, published in the Social Science & Medicine Journal in 2014, has shown that those who trust organizations affected by the vaccine can be beaten, as well as those who do not suffer from the knowledge and become more vaccinated. skeptical.
Continued discussions about vaccination control in rich countries also feel complicated as poor countries continue to be vaccinated. In fact, the proportion of people who received COVID-19 vaccine is over 76 percent in high-income countries, but only 6 percent of low-income earners.
COVAX – a WHO-led approach to reducing vaccine disparities between high- and low-income countries – initially aimed at distributing 2.2 billion 2.2 billion COVID Vaccine Countries to countries that cannot afford them by early 2022. has been changed to 1.4 billion levels, among other things because of the complexity. The WHO is now concerned that the release of Omicron will cause rich countries to store more jabs, which will increase vaccine inconsistencies.
On the bright side, the anti-COVID-19 vaccine is growing steadily, which could help countries with low vaccines. Antibody treatment, in addition to the UK-approved Xevudy drug from GSK, has been found to reduce hospitalization and mortality by about 80 percent of high-risk adults. Antiviral drugs that take oral molnupiravir have also been found to reduce the risk of serious infections by one-third.
In a healthy country, anyone with a chance to get a vaccine that can protect them from COVID-19 and help reduce the spread of the virus can get it. But in the real world, where many people already have fears about vaccinations and are often told lies, making everyone accept a jab is not an easy task.
Forcing people to receive the vaccine by imposing strict and restrictive penalties, however, can be more harmful than good. It can prove the people’s fear that the “elected government” is against them, or that they are losing their rights and freedoms. All of this can make those who are skeptical of vaccinations today reluctant to follow government advice in times of health crisis.
Public health programs require public approval to succeed. Governments currently considering enforcing the COVID-19 vaccine should be aware that, despite short-term testing, such principles could have serious consequences for all of us over time.
The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Al Jazeera.
[ad_2]
Source link
