Prohibition of media protests in cases involving the massacre of Floyd | Stories of Black Lives

In the media, media groups have called for the underprivileged to see a civil rights trial that begins on Thursday.

Press conference to restrict access to civil rights cases against three former Minneapolis police officers case on George Floyd’s death would be like a criminal closure.

U.S. Regional Judge Paul Magnuson, citing COVID-19, reduced the number of people who could be in his court to delay the prosecution of officials for allegedly depriving Floyd of his rights while in office.

Election of judges for high-profile cases begins this week and open debates are set for next week. Minneapolis fired police officers – Tou Thao, J Kueng and Thomas Laneare – are accused of violating Floyd’s rights; fourth, Derek Chauvin he pleaded guilty in a federal case in December.

Floyd pa death, filmed by a man, shocked the United States and launched into a series of months demonstrations as well as violent conflicts with police over city justice in the US in 2020.

Chauvin is a former Minneapolis white man who kept Floyd from being stabbed in the road by the knee in the Black Man’s neck despite Floyd pleading not to rest. Chauvin was found guilty of murder in a criminal case last year and sentenced to 22.5 years in prison.

In line with long-standing criminal laws, cases against Thao, Kueng and Laneare will not be made public or public.

Magnuson has banned the amount of what can be seen on closed-court diets, which will be sent to floodplains as far as journalists and a few people can see.

Chauvin’s government indictment on murder charges was released. The judge in the case differed from the state limits on cameras, arguing about the need to reach people in the middle of the epidemic.

“We do not need to explain to this Court the magnitude of the case, how Floyd’s death affected Twin Cities and the rest of the world, or whether there was much concern about the conduct of judges and people accused of murder. he, “media organizations including The Associated Press said in a January 17 letter.

“As a result, ensuring that the case … is open to the public and the public is important.”

Two members of the press are allowed to enter the courtroom during the jury. The press conference said no one would be allowed in the area, not even the family members of the accused or the Floyd family.

In the same case, only four journalists and an artist will be allowed, including relatives, but none of them are ordinary people.

Living in flooded radio rooms with the general public can be about 40 each. Viewers in the floodplain will look at the use of lighting that will only give a minimalist look. Experimental screens cannot be disclosed immediately.

“It is incumbent on all concerned to ensure that the media coverage of the case is fair and accurate and that the public has a better understanding of the public prosecution process, as well as a better understanding of how judges approach their decisions,” the letter said.

“The best way to ensure such a publication is to provide the media with access to the case and the relevant evidence.”

Magnuson “has tried to influence the interests of the media and the public, but as the letter points out, he has to work harder,” said Jane Kirtley, director of the Silha Center for the Study of Media Ethics and Law at the University of Minnesota. , which is one of the 18 signatories to the letter.

Kirtley said recent cases in the Chauvin State Court, as well as former Brooklyn Center director Kim Potter, in the state shooting death by Daunte Wright, showed that the cameras do not interfere with and do not violate the privacy of witnesses or judges.