Mother sues Meta and Snap for suicide between daughter | Social Media Articles

An American woman blamed the companies for the suicide of their 11-year-old daughter, who had a “massive” habit of social networking.

Meta Platforms Inc. by Snap Inc. and the 11-year-old suicide bomber who used to use Instagram and Snapchat, the girl’s mother said in the case.

The mother says her daughter Selena Rodriguez suffered for two years with a “big habit” on the Meta photo sharing platform and Snap messaging app before committing suicide last year.

The lawsuit in San Francisco court is not the first case of juvenile delinquency on television, but it comes at a critical juncture on platforms affecting millions of young people around the world.

In November, a group of senior US lawyers announced an Instagram survey on their efforts to attract children and young people, in light of the dangers of social networking that could lead to mental health problems. The international investigation was launched after a former Facebook employee testified in Congress that the company was aware of, but did not disclose, the harm caused by its activities such as Instagram.

The controversy over social media is not just happening in the US The father of a 14-year-old boy in the UK hit fire when he said the 2017 suicide was on Instagram. The company told the BBC it did not condone self-harm.

“We are saddened to hear of Selena’s death and our hearts go out to her family,” a Snap spokeswoman said Friday in an email. “While we cannot comment on current cases, nothing is more important to us than the life of our community.”

Meta and Snap knew or needed to know that “their social media content was harmful to many of the users,” according to a Thursday lawsuit. “In other words, the defendants deliberately created a problem for young children, but failed to provide adequate protection from the problems they know are happening in their digital environments.”

Meta representatives did not respond to email for comment.

A Meta spokesman said in November that the company’s claims to the security benefits were false and that “we are continuing to develop new products to help people who are experiencing similar human or physical challenges.”

Snap said in May the suspension of the projects by the two developers “due to excessive concern for the security of the Snapchat team” on the basis of a malicious death and a group filed in California criticized the companies for failing to comply. their policies against cyber bullying.

Tammy Rodriguez, who lives in Connecticut, said that after trying to limit her daughter’s access to the platform, the girl ran away from home. She took her daughter to a doctor who said she had “never seen a patient with a social problem like Selena,” according to the suit.

The lawsuit was widely criticized on Snapchat, claiming that the platform offers rewards to users of “dangerous and dangerous” dating methods. The woman claims allegations of a commercial problem, negligence and violation of consumer protection laws in California. One of the lawyers in the case is from the Social Media Victims Law Center, a law firm based in Seattle.

“Snapchat allows people to communicate with their real friends, without social pressure and to compare it to social media, and deliberately makes it harder for strangers to talk to young people,” Snapshot said. “We are working with a number of insane organizations to provide Snapchatters equipment and resources as part of our mission to protect our community.”

Media companies have been particularly successful in tackling criminal charges in response to the 1996 federal law that protects Internet sites from being held accountable for users’ use of the Internet.

The case is by Rodriguez v. Meta Platforms Inc. f / k / a Facebook Inc. 3: 22-cv-00401, US Supreme Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).

(Updates and Snap comments.)
-By the help of Naomi Nix.