Kyle Rittenhouse was not found guilty of any crime | Court Matters

A U.S. court has ruled that Kyle Rittenhouse is not guilty of any criminal activity shooting at protesters at a protest against racial injustice in Kenosha, Wisconsin, last year.

Rittenhouse, now 18, was sentenced to life in prison for shooting Joseph Rosenbaum and Anthony Huber and injuring Gaige Grosskreutz during a grand demonstration on August 25, 2020.

Twelve judges on Friday found Rittenhouse not guilty of two counts of murder, one count of attempted murder and two counts of security breach.

Rittenhouse strongly appealed the verdict, which came as soon as the judge ordered the court to remain silent or dismissed.

“The charges against him [the] the defendant in all cases is discriminated against and released on bail, “Judge Bruce Schroeder told the court.

Rittenhouse’s lawyers claimed he had the right to carry the rifle he had brought to the show and that he had. he had to defend himself attacked.

But human rights groups and US anti-apartheid activists condemned Friday’s ruling as “bad”.

“The Rittenhouse case underscores the need for urgent police reform and legal action. The system has broken down, and it needs to be redesigned,” said Shaadie Ali, the recent head of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) in Wisconsin.

“The verdict in the #KyleRittenhouse case is disgusting and fails to provide justice for those who lost their lives as they peacefully marched to protest against police brutality and violence,” the NAACP, a national rights group, said. tweet.

The the temptations that most people see has sparked heated debate in the US over discrimination, gun violence, and vigilance.

Commenting outside the courtroom, John Jendren of Al Jazeera said there was “significant concern” about the possible consequences of the decision.

“We expect to see more powerful police forces today,” he said. “Whether we look at the repetition of what happened in the summer of 2020, we do not know. There were no crowds gathered on the court steps.”

Judgment in #KyleRittenhouse the case is brutal and fails to provide justice on behalf of those who lost their lives as they peacefully gathered to stage protests against police brutality and violence.

– NAACP (@NAACP) November 19, 2021

A resident of Illinois, Rittenhouse went to Kenosha near the protests that began in August 2020 after a white police officer opened fire. Jacob Blake, The Black Man, behind him, cripples him.

The demonstrations took place in the middle widespread violence in cities in the United States After the death three months earlier George Floyd, an unarmed black man, was killed in Minneapolis with a white police officer.

Rittenhouse said it was in Kenosha to protect property from perpetrators and to provide assistance to anyone in need.

But the prosecutor said the teenager motivated murderous violence. Attorney Thomas Binger repeatedly showed the judges a drone video that he said showed Rittenhouse pointing an AR-type weapon to the demonstrators.

“You can’t hide to protect yourself if you cause this,” Binger said he said on his last arguments. “If you cause the accident, you lose the right to protect yourself by bringing the gun, pointing it at people, threatening the lives of the people. The judge angered everything.”

Rittenhouse’s lawyers have moved on because of the charges, alleging that the defendants provided them with a digital digital drone video that showed Rittenhouse raising his gun and pointing it at the protesters. During the hearing, the judges asked for a review of the video.

Rittenhouse security forces also tried to label the protesters as the perpetrators of the violence.

At the end of the altercation, Rittenhouse’s lawyer Mark Richards called Rosenbaum – the first person to be shot during the protests – the “violent” and “crazy” who followed Rittenhouse.

“Mr. Rosenbaum was shot because he chased my client and killed him, took his gun and did what he threatened,” Richards said, adding that Rittenhouse was attacked by a “mob”.

Rittenhouse defended himself during the trial, he says interesting evidence that he was afraid for his life on a fatal night. “I did not want to kill them. I wanted to stop my attackers, ”he told the court.

The judge was forced to order a leave of absence after Rittenhouse began to cry in memory of the cause of the shooting.

Reverting back to the defendants in the case, the judge dismissed the case against Rittenhouse for possessing a firearm for minors.

The innocent verdict appears to have been based on the definition of self-defense in Wisconsin state law and the interpretation of the video judges of the incident, said Gene Rossi, a former state attorney who has been watching the case.

Reliance on security in the second and second review of the videos and the evidence of Rittenhouse itself, has made it difficult for him to win his case, Rossi told Al Jazeera.

“The judges must have felt that Rittenhouse had not been harmed by the victims and that they had a right to self-defense,” he said.

But Rittenhouse’s detractors posed for a bigger picture to see the defendant’s role now in the assassination. “The facts in Rittenhouse’s case do not matter,” the Gravel Institute, a left-wing advocacy group, said in a tweet.

“The point is, the system saw fit to go through a thorough and careful process. Did it add such freedom to the millions of people who carry drugs, steal from stores, or violate their pardons?”