World News

Israel’s attorney general has ruled in favor of Sheikh Jarrah | Conflicts between Israel and Palestine Issues

Israel’s attorney general has told the Supreme Court not to interfere in Sheikh Jarrah’s well-known cases, while four Palestinian families living in East Jerusalem should be expelled as soon as possible instead of favoring Israeli organizations.

In a statement released Monday, Avichai Mendelblit said there was “no room” for intervention.

Last month, the Supreme Court gave the attorney general until June 8 to comment on the matter.

In a letter to the court, Mendelblit wrote that in light of the many legal processes that have taken place in the region for Sheikh Jarrah over the years, he saw no need to appear in court.

The attorney general’s decision has left the Supreme Court free to decide whether to hear the appeal of four Palestinian families in two court cases that require them to leave their home.

The four families are a group of more than 500 Palestinian people – with 28 families – who are being forced to flee the area.

Israeli Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit has given a press conference in Israel [File: Menahem Kahana/AFP]

Sami Irsheid, a lawyer with Sheikh Jarrah’s security forces who have been threatened with forced eviction, told Al Jazeera that Mendelblit’s view does not mean the case is no longer political.

“The attorney general’s response was temporary, when he said he felt there was no need to intervene as there was a problem,” Irsheid said. “But we will not stop arguing with them on international cases.”

According to Israel daily Haaretz, a source close to Mendelblit said Israeli political leaders agreed with their idea of ​​avoiding litigation in court instead of the government.

Haaretz also told Mendelblit officials that the case against Sheikh Jarrah’s family was weak, and that “his legal views could not justify his deportation.”

Divorce Sheikh Jarrah’s families

According to Sheikh Jarrah’s family, Mendelbit’s refusal to allow the Mendelbit to intervene in the matter did not mean that the case was a criminal offense but a forced eviction.

“We confirm that the occupying state of Israel – everywhere from the prime minister to all the institutions and events in Israel – is seeking to relocate Sheikh Jarrah’s citizens, and to advance Israeli settlement in East Jerusalem,” the statement said. pazanema said.

“We are also convinced that this has violated all international conventions and human rights, and we are confident that these efforts will not dampen our resolve to persevere in our countries.”

Irsheid said the ball is now in the corner of the court.

“It is up to the Supreme Court to decide whether they want to hear from the attorney general or be satisfied with what he said,” he told Al Jazeera.

The court is expected to issue a ruling in favor of Israeli organizations, but Irsheid said it did not agree that Mendelblit’s view would change the course of the court.

“At the end of the day, his intention is to continue the political process that the state of Israel has been pursuing for the past 20 years, in which it seeks to reduce Sheikh Jarrah’s causes of conflict between the two sides,” he said. He said.

(Al Jazeera)

According to Al Jazeera journalist Mohammed Watad, Mendelblit’s views are also seen as a way to save Israel from all judicial offenses if Sheikh Jarrah’s case is referred to the International Criminal Court.

“It is also a way of helping the Israeli government to be repressed by other countries, to present this issue as a dispute between the foreign delegation and the Palestinian Authority, and that the court’s decision was made after the Israeli judiciary – called democracy,” he said.

‘Dodging responsibility’

Israeli liberation movements have opposed the idea of ​​a senior lawyer, with Peace Now described it as “a way to avoid escalation.”

The commission called on Israel to “submit to the people and to take their stand, as families are being discriminated against under the laws of Israel and Palestine.”

Ir Amim, another Israeli human rights group, said the attorney general’s idea “opened the way for the eviction” and could affect the cases of more than 80 families who have been threatened with asylum.

“There is also a place for political interference,” said Amy Cohen.

Sheikh Jarrah’s cause has attracted worldwide attention and has caused outrage throughout the world. The 28 Palestinian families have been living in their homes around the world since 1956, which was built according to the UN and Jordan refugee system that ruled East Jerusalem until 1967.

Proponents of her case have been working to make the actual transcript of this statement available online.

An Israeli court decision regarding the immediate expulsion of four Palestinian families was reversed in May, following daily protests and shelters that were violently sprayed by Israeli soldiers with tear gas, voice bombs, and rubber bullets.

The growth was intensified after Israeli forces seized the Al-Aqsa Mosque – the third most holy place for Muslims – several times during the holy month of Ramadan, injuring hundreds of Palestinians.

The eagles incited troops from the Gaza Strip to shoot, which Israel responded with an 11-day strike that killed at least 260 Palestinians, 66 of whom were children. In Israel, 12 people, including two children, were also killed.

Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Back to top button