World News

Iraq’s new parliament meets for the first time amid uncertainty | Stories

[ad_1]

Baghdad, Iraq About three months after October elections, The newly elected Iraqi parliament is due to convene for the first time following a series of elections that, despite the nature of Iraq, were uncertain and confusing.

Traditionally, the first sitting of parliament will be responsible for electing the speaker of parliament and its two ministers. However, according to a press release issued by the Council of Representatives, Sunday’s session will only include “the election of the Speaker and two ministers”, meaning not confirming who the speaker is.

The electoral commission told Mahmoud al-Mashhadani’s representative that he was the oldest member of parliament and would preside over the first general election.

The process, according to experts, will be simple: no political party has seized enough aid to move the Iraqi politics over the next four years.

Early elections – which saw a sharp decline in the number of voters since a political coup was launched following a US-led coup in 2003, in which 44 percent were rejected. Muqtada al-Sadr, a senior Shia leader whose politics were imprisoned for his refusal to exist in Iraq, to ​​win the most 73 seats out of 329 seats.

It also embarrassed the Fateh alliance, which includes the pro-Iran Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF). Having secured just 17 seats, the council will see a significant drop in the number of representatives compared to the outgoing parliament.

In the months leading up to the first parliamentary session, Iraqi politics was deeply affected by the rally after a meeting between various parties trying to form a government that can advance their interests, which is constantly connected. statements fraud and threats to boycott the entire election results.

Dust often settled after the Iraqi Federal Supreme Court ruled in favor of the final election results in late December last year, with a slight change in the preliminary results, although disputes over the outcome of the election could still affect the incumbent government for several months. design.

Al-Sadr, who has won a landslide victory in the run-up to his campaign for a new electoral law to his advantage, has been pushing for a major government that could establish a deal with Fateh and the former Prime Minister. Nouri al-Maliki on the opposing side.

“I see the first thing that needs to be done in the future of this country is a democratic government,” al-Sadr said in a statement after confirming the results of the election.

The phrase, “not East or West” was first inspired by him after the release of the initial results, he was repeatedly pushed into his political career, insultingly rejecting foreign influence and hoping to establish a major government. But this does not have to be interpreted literally in the formation of government.

The Shia Coordination Framework, a group formed by al-Maliki State of Law, a coalition of Fateh and its allies, does not want to send the next government to Sadr-led government and continues to promote unity.

During this difficult discussion, almost every conceivable meeting was held. Meetings were also held throughout the country, from Baghdad to Najaf to Erbil. However, although negotiations appear to be ongoing between the political parties, no agreement has been reached.

“Political divisions in Iraq make it difficult for many governments to be elected and since no party has won a majority, it is important to build unity, whether it be a central government or a united government,” said Hamzeh Hadad, an Iraqi politician. and economist, recently wrote.

The long-term process of forming a government that ultimately separates the people who participated in the elections is not an issue in Iraq.

In previous elections after the 2003 uprising, negotiations that led to the establishment of the government lasted several months, and were often accompanied by violence. And almost without exception, the ruling authorities infiltrated their ranks, and Iraq continues to suffer from corruption, violence and a lack of good governance.

“Government formation is where Iraq’s political agenda is tested to ensure its resilience and when the negative effects of unity, sectarianism and inequality come together to bring about a weak, ineffective, and corrupt government and disunity,” said Sajad Jiyad, a colleague of the Century Foundation, wrote on social media.

Doubt

These disagreements will be addressed directly when the first sitting of parliament convenes to elect a speaker. Uncertainty is still rife among Sunni parties.

“To date, there has been no consensus between Sunni Taqadum and al-Azim,” Kamaran Palani, a researcher at the Middle East Research Institute, said of the two major Sunni groups.

“[Mohammed] Halbousi has a lot within the Sunni community, but this is not enough because Sunni parties also need strong Shia great blessings. Halbousi is not supported by the system and Sadr is flexible. ”

The uncertainty surrounding the election of the speaker of parliament extends to two other presidents: the President, held by the Kurds, and the Prime Minister, Shia. Similarly, their political parties have not yet reached an agreement, either.

No name is yet to come to the fore, and tensions are running high as al-Sadr pushes Sadrist’s nominee and the Shia Framework is still determined to name a candidate from their bloc.

“The country has often had a weak government minister, because it comes from a weak political base, whether as a candidate, or a successor,” Hadad described the upcoming crisis. Iraqi politics, especially in relation to the confidence of ordinary Iraqi people in the process.

“Unfortunately, this will only add to the frustration of the Iraqi people whose voting votes directly have grown.”



[ad_2]

Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Back to top button