‘Human betrayal, the planet’: The world is affected by COP26 climate change agreement Weather Problems

The international climate dialogue in Glasgow, Scotland, culminated in an agreement that the United Nations called both an “important step” and a “disunity”, but which some human rights activists have denounced as “the world’s infidelity with the people”.

The agreement, which was ratified by about 200 countries on Saturday, erupted in applause over the prospect of global warming reaching 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit), but disappointed many with a last-minute change that lowered the important language of coal. The reform, which was encouraged by India and backed by China, called on countries to “reduce” rather than “eliminate” the use of fossil fuels.

The treaty did not help alleviate the concerns of high-risk countries on long-term financial commitments from rich countries, by changing the need for the establishment of compensation for countries at risk of “loss and damage” and the possibility of further economic talks. story.

“The text is official and inconsistent,” said UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres. “It reflects the tastes, attitudes, and contradictions of today’s political ideas.”

The alliance, when it wants to do important things, “is not enough,” he said. “It’s time to dump her and move on.”

John Kerry, the former ambassador to the United States, acknowledged the agreement, saying that tolerance would leave everyone feeling a little dissatisfied.

“We are leaving Glasgow with a dramatic increase in the country’s desire to address this issue in the last decade and beyond,” he said, adding: “We are closer than ever to avoid climate change and access to clean, fresh water. . a healthy world. ”

Chinese spokesman Zhao Yingmin repeated the same.

“I think our biggest achievement is completing the rule book,” Zhao told reporters. “Now we can begin to use them and deliver on our commitments.”

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, who led the COP26 talks, remained elated.

“There’s a lot we can do in the coming years,” Johnson said. “But the current consortium is a big step forward and, with difficulty, we have the first international agreement to reduce coal and a way to reduce global warming to 1.5 degrees.”

The Saudi ambassador, one of the world’s largest oil producers, declined to comment, saying all parties were “happy”.

“We are good, we are good,” said Ayman M Shasly, a Saudi ambassador. “The idea is accepted. No Comments. Everyone is happy. All the parties are happy with the decision so we are fine. “

Lee White, Gabon’s Minister of Environment and chair of the African Union, said the African group had achieved “60 percent of our expectations”.

“We would love to make a significant contribution to a sustainable transition economy,” he said. “But we have a very close relationship with the EU and the US.”

The small island states said “progress” in Glasgow was not enough.

“What is appropriate and appealing to some parties will not help the Maldives change over time,” said Aminath Shauna, the environment minister for the Indian Ocean Islands. “It will be too late in the Maldives.”

Saleemul Hug, director of the International Center for Climate Change and Development, was outspoken.

He said: “I feel he has failed.

“(Here I am) is one of the programs that I am helping the poorest people in the world who are already suffering from climate change. And we need Glasgow’s place in the economy and economic recovery here. “It has been changed and we have the opportunity to discuss … frustrating and unacceptable.”

Human rights activists also protested.

Environmentalist Greta Thunberg said the talks were fruitless but “blah blah blah”.

“Real work is going on outside these halls,” the head of the Fridays for future group wrote on Twitter. “And we will never give up.”

Asad Rehman, a campaigner for War on Want, a group working on poverty alleviation in the world, described the treaty as “a betrayal of the people and the world”.

“It is an insult to science, a reflection of the realities of climate change and the destruction of human life,” he said. “The only people who are celebrating this are the hundreds of activists from the oil and gas industry, whose demands are,” We can not see any change, we cannot move away from our oil-generating economy. “