Donald Rumsfeld was a robber in a suit and tie | US & Canada

[ad_1]
Donald Rumsfeld was a self-defense banner like a banal, a security guard wearing a suit and tie.
Wearing all the clothes of the de rigueur, it was the epitaph who immediately remembered when I heard of his death yesterday.
In the same way, I think, he will be remembered by the many traumatized people who live in the remnants of the devastation, suffering, and grief.
And, if truth is any guide, that is how it should be remembered by anyone who has not been blinded by the legitimate lies that can now be told about who and what Rumsfeld was.
Based on this, there will be regular responses, written by skeptics who announce star life, unwavering work in succession, in some cases, presidents and a grateful country.
To taste the heartbreaking joy that will follow his death, here is the Associated Press describing Rumsfeld as “the most talented and visionary modern US military leader” whose history “was revealed by the long and cheap war in Iraq.”
With the AP’s good reputation, Rumsfeld apparently led a normal, but fulfilling life, his “skills” and his “vision”, tragically, that, as a result of the wrong war, one.
Unsuccessful in Rumsfeld’s misdeeds, the AP shared a vignette about the former US Defense Secretary and readers: “‘Rummy,’ as he is often called, was ambitious, smart, hardworking, hardworking and capable of entertaining others.”
My goodness.
These are the undisputed moments when “established” journalists repeat his letters by writing oh kind and respectful “honorable” to strong men with important roles when the moment demands unwavering honesty.
Moral values will not allow for the rapid erosion of Rumsfeld’s legacy as lightning, unrepentant, unscrupulous builder and state-sanctioned loot called “renditions”.
Rumsfeld’s independence – with divine zeal, determination – all known, destructive, and inhumane on the US false doctrines that have translated, over and over again, frustrated, destroyed, and died in the red zone.
In Rumsfeld’s geopolitical calculus, the US was a good Globo-policeman and he, a happy warrior wearing a knitted suit and tie, imagined a country – especially in the Middle East and Afghanistan – that resembled a myth, made in America of good democracy and more.
Ironically, the obscurity, in fact, is that one of the definitions of evangelical believers like Rumsfeld – as the presidents who served them – is important and, of course, crippling and killing at an insignificant rate in order to achieve their charitable goals.
Rumsfeld was a forced laborer who, in word and deed, assisted – in his small, murderous home – assassins living in the Oval Office, known as the superintendent.
By that measure, Rumsfeld was a winner. He ordered others to kill people from a safe, safe Pentagon coconut, as always, from any threat or prosecution.
As a result, in the remainder of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, Rumsfeld and its co-conspirators took advantage of the situation to establish their own dangerous and dangerous records.
The first attack on Afghanistan in September 2001 to defeat the Taliban and shoot al-Qaeda. History and geography may have prompted Rumsfeld to attempt a military coup. He did not.
The tragic, inexhaustible consequences of the Rumsfeld explosion and its absurdity are obvious – many innocent Afghan and civilians in the United States lost their lives, billions were lost, and the sick and repatriated Taliban is ready to re-establish its evil rule over the wounded and become a 20-year American intervention.
Rumsfeld’s crackdown on Afghanistan has led to the disruption of the Bush administration in Iraq.
It was a war of choice and a big lie, fabricated – approved and modified by the same respectful media companies Rumsfeld today – that Saddam Hussein not only had weapons of mass destruction but was intent, and “insane”, to liberate them in London and beyond.
Once again, the Rumsfeld company and the cocksure who insisted on speeding, cheap, and successful were warned: there were no WMDs; the seizure will destroy, not “liberate” Iraq and neighboring countries; and the price in life and wealth cannot be the same.
Rumsfeld denounced those who engaged in sexual and legal acts. “I don’t do quagmires,” he said once.
Yes, he did.
Iraq and Iraqis still have the evils – mentally, physically and spiritually – of Rumsfeld’s signature, cruelty, and ignorance.
Rumsfeld reinforced his negligence by playing actively in a secret society, a conspiracy by George W Bush and Dick Cheney to spy on and destroy the American people opposed to the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.
However, the most obvious and conclusive evidence of the crimes Rumsfeld committed was a group of international prisons that ruled inside and outside Iraq to torture – using sick, twisting and weapons – anyone suspected of engaging in American “enemies”.
Rumsfeld thought about international law and practices, illegal while American terrorists roamed, unpunished, arrested and handed over as property in concentration camps that were tortured and forgotten.
Through it all, Rumsfeld chased the grin which was, at the same time, a sign of his arrogance and accuracy in the destructive American rescue mission. His vague, uninteresting response to questions about the serious failure of the project exposed Rumsfeld’s temporary incompatibility and suicide.
Rumsfeld must have known that he had survived the trauma of the tragedy and the suffering it had caused to so many injured people, in so many damaged areas.
He is said to have died at home, surrounded by relatives.
This is a calm, gentle situation that Donald Rumsfeld did not deserve and that he refused to do for many other damaged people, in many other damaged areas.
The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the editor of Al Jazeera.
[ad_2]
Source link



