We live two countries: We are citizens and guests of ” net says, ”The world’s largest and most powerful corporation. Although we are digital and physical creatures, we do a great job of sorting out how to navigate this space. We comply with local laws and regulations, and we comply with applicable laws or regulations regarding the sites and services we open.
Yet the two-state solution seems to be undermining governments. They may realize that Big Tech has worldly power, but they do not seem to know how to deal with their non-national infrastructure. As a result, many countries are becoming increasingly sophisticated in terms of network control, throwing out the world’s oldest weapons such as fines and laws into unethical ether.
Fortunately, few countries are committed to finding the best solution for Big Tech. In 2017, Denmark recorded history when it voted Casper Cluster, a longtime ambassador to the world, to become the world’s most accomplished ambassador. When I asked him as soon as he was elected to express his views on how governments can deal with the network, he told me, “A freight train is coming … so it’s not an IT office that has to deal with technology; security principles. Few countries get this.”
At the time, Denmark seemed to be the only country that saw Big Tech as a political party. However, by 2021, a dozen other countries have adopted the Danish model. This is a high start, but it is not enough. Every country needs professional advisers — and with great urgency. While government officials are lagging behind in public reading and digital reading, Big Tech continues to move forward, gaining momentum worldwide. As they do, tech users float around the platform especially unprotected, our information is opened, redesigned, and sold without our mention. But professional spies could provide governments with a number of tools to deal with this. From traditional perspectives such as recognizing alliances with their enemies to modern methods such as alliances between civilians, ambassadors with skilled expertise that can help countries continue to move abroad.
At the moment, most governments seem to have no effective way to protect their citizens digitally. Their attempts to date have been a taboo subject, fines, or stricter rules – all of which have not changed on the platform. Public hearing makes government officials look angry and indifferent, as parents scold teens who have been approached (see, for example, when Florida Gus Bilirakis asked Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg about posted on YouTube-One, it’s Google, not Facebook). Legislation takes a long time to be implemented, the technical part often rushes around before working. For example, before the European Union Protection General (GDPR), Facebook moved 1.5 billion users from EU sites to avoid these new laws. Even large fines have been proven to be ineffective: $ 1 billion fine like the Google one that took place in 2019 it is just as painful as the company can only recoup a small amount of money two weeks.
The rules fail because modern companies change the way they describe themselves and the way they work. For example, when France issued a document in 2015 seeking information from the operating industry, hail companies used their Agreements as evidence that technically they were not “operating companies”But instead of comparing businesses. And since there was no way to determine how soon the language of these companies would be changed, the companies did not leave. French diplomat Henri Verdier, a professional scientist before being appointed ambassador, introduced technical expertise to address the problem by developing an open weapon, Open the Archive Terms, which allows everyone to see which terms have been changed in the Terms of Service for more than 100 companies.
To be honest, governments have cut short their work to find their regulatory agencies with ideas. As Canadian attorney general Rana Sarkar tells me, “The idea that you are an ambassador who is not real and doesn’t look … is a problem for foreign ministers. And antibodies in foreign governments are fighting against what doesn’t seem to come from these groups. and strong. ”But the need for professional spies is far stronger than the government can deny. When it comes to international relations, most countries currently do not have carrots, they just stick. Every country needs professional technologies that can understand digital cultural traditions and different communication systems that can. Austrian diplomat Martin Rauchbauer explains: “We see ourselves … as a translator between different countries. And because of the digital age, I think dialogue is important.”
Source link
