Beijing’s South China Sea calls it ‘grossly disrespectful’ of the law | South China Sea News

China’s actions in the South China Sea, including “historical claims” on almost every aspect of the key trade route “seriously violate the rule of law” at sea and international law, the US has recently concluded. reports.

The U.S. State Department said in a report released Wednesday that all the results of Beijing ‘statement were “that it claims to be a ruler or that it has enough power over the South China Sea”.

“For this reason, the United States and many other countries have denied the allegations in accordance with international law and regulations on maritime law in South China and around the world.”

The report, entitled Limits in the Seas, stated that apart from the lack of “essentials”, China. notification of “old freedom” a sea of ​​more than 3.5 million sq km (1.35 million sq mile) “is missing due to its poor condition”.

“The PRC stated that its former rights were ‘protected by international law,’ but did not provide any valid justification,” the report said of the country and its name, People’s Republic of China (PRC). ).

China refers to the so-called “nine-line” to assert its sovereignty over the entire South China Sea.

The International Court of Justice in The Hague has declared a “no legal basis” according to the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea that Beijing signed, after the Philippines, which claims to be part of the South China Sea, legally imposed it. actions against Beijing.

Washington has been intensifying its rhetorical and diplomatic efforts to challenge Beijing on a number of issues, including questioning. also mentioned the arrest of Uighurs Muslims in Xinjiang and the issuance of a national security law in Hong Kong, since Joe Biden took over the presidency last year.

It has also deployed several aircraft carriers and warships for verification “Navigation Freedom” freedom in the South China Sea, and in addition to its alliances with other regional authorities such as India, Japan and Australia through the Indo-Pacific Quad group.

Contradictory arguments

Apart from China, parts of the South China Sea are also mentioned by Taiwan and neighboring countries such as the Philippines, Vietnam, Brunei and Malaysia.

In recent years, China has expanded its military presence in the region by building production islands and airports, where it has placed missiles and other weapons.

The Chinese Maritime militia has been deployed, and is accused of “torturing” fishermen from the Philippines and “running” parts of the sea within the economic realm of Manila. In October, Malaysia has accused China of “invading” its seas.

These projects have transformed the rich local waters into a spectacular landscape, threatening to disrupt $ 5 trillion in global trade.

A recent State Department report also questioned China’s claims for “control” over more than 100 items in the South China Sea that have sunk to the ground.

“Such claims are inconsistent with international law, while such practices must not be sanctioned by the state or may result in maritime territories as part of the sea,” the report said.

China has been using the claim that it has the power to make such things available or to claim its right to photograph, “straight start” and take local water.

The US states that “no ‘four’ island groups’ mentioned by China” in the South China Sea have met the requirements for applying the principles under the Convention.

“There is no separate body of international law that supports the PRC’s decision to close all islands directly,” the report said.

“It is not permitted by international law” for China to refer to the watershed, regional territories, economic bases only, and the international shelf “established in the care of each group of South China Sea islands”.

“In so-called maritime areas, the PRC also makes numerous statements that do not comply with international law,” the report said.

China has not yet responded to the report but has repeatedly rejected The Hague’s 2016 decision to reject “nine lines”, while insisting on its “former rights” on the South China Sea.

In the past, he has said that his military presence in the South China Sea is “a self-defense goal”, and that he has no intention of seeking “hegemony” or “establishing affected areas” in the region.