Facebook-affiliated Facebook has criticized the Indian government over new laws that say it could allow administrators to monitor and violate users’ privacy.
The callers said they had filed a lawsuit on Wednesday in the Delhi High Court. It also said the new “compliance” laws in India, which require technology companies to provide information to private senders, violate the citizen’s right to privacy.
Mu blog post, WhatsApp said the rules could force them to break the code to the point where it hides user messages and could lead to a “new way of exposing more people”. The rules were followed in February as part of a new media law set to begin on Wednesday.
“Government agencies and technology experts around the world have been emphasizing that the need to ‘keep track of’ confidential information could undermine secrecy and lead to real violence,” WhatsApp said. “WhatsApp is committed to protecting the privacy of our communications and we will continue to do all we can under the Indian law to do this.”
The case was first reported by Reuters. The new rules allow the government to remove content that it deems obscene, to publish information and direct online activities and online content.
The need to escalate conflicts with television companies. Twitter made headlines in New Delhi this week after citing a tweet by a ruling party spokesman as “disruptive media”. Anti-terrorism police went to the company’s offices on Monday after receiving complaints about the tree.
Last week, India’s IT ministry ordered the TV industry to crack down on what it called “false” by writing “all that it describes, or meaning” the Indian nation “of coronavirus”.
The country is the largest market on WhatsApp with a population of 530m, according to estimates by the Indian government. Late last year, the company received approval to set up a paid job in India following the delay.
“The government has put its foot down,” said Jayanth Kolla, Bangalore’s technology analyst for Convergence Catalyst. “It seems there was no middle ground in the speech.”
Source link
