Tech News

The US is complaining about vaccines. Now it’s encouraging.

[ad_1]

Just days after the Tedros press conference, in response to international pressure, Biden’s management promised a 20-million-dollar vaccine for the Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson vaccines at COVAX. This represents a major change in the law: it was the first time the US had provided money that could have been spent at home. (Supervisors also volunteered to donate 60 million AstraZeneca Doses to COVAX but did not do so.)

Glenn Cohen, a law professor who oversees the Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy at Harvard, Biotechnology, and Bioethics, says the 20-million-dollar pledge is the “first phase” of a country that cannot afford to get enough vaccine. .

But, he adds, it does not ignore the moral imperative Having cities and countries in the United States that offer, or would consider offering, vaccinations to tourists as a rule. Cohen, who authored a book on medical tourism, says the vaccine should go first to “those most in need” and not to “people who can walk, who have visas, who have the power.”

In other words, it’s like: “It’s like” someone borrows his car loan to take your mother to the hospital, and then decides to take the car instead of returning it to the person – or taking other people to the hospital – you drive like Uber. ”

Releasing the morally troubled people

Robert Amler, dean of the technical science school at New York Medical College, says that encouraging travelers to the United States from places with very low vaccines – as well as the potential for many diseases – could be detrimental to public health.

“Each risk of‘ infecting ’this type of disease depends on the number of comers and the number of comers with covid fever,” says Amler, a former hospital senior at the CDC. “We can no longer say for sure that the city can improve its population as it grows.”

To address this problem, some people who go to get vaccinated are taking their own precautions to avoid detection of HIV — or other types of injuries.

“Michael” (also a nickname) and his wife left Quito, Ecuador, for New Orleans for a five-day trip in May, when they received a J&J shot and received Pfizer’s first vaccine.

Michael’s family in Canada has not met the couple’s twin children, who were born in January 2020. On their way to Louisiana to shoot, they are said to be selling their vaccines quickly – and as a result of reuniting with their family – at 6 to 9 months.

However, the couple wanted to make sure they did not get the vaccine that would have passed to someone else. “Our first thought was to go red, because we know it’s more than we want,” he explains.

They also took precautions before and during their trip, too. Since both of them had been infected with the virus in the past, they tested positive before it spread. Then they maintained themselves to reduce their visibility.

“The question is about what countries are doing with their economies and the countries that continue to use them [vaccines] their benefit. All over the world, it’s wrong. “

Nicole Hassoun, Binghamton University

In doing so, they may be able to reduce the risk of complications on their journey, but this highlights another challenge of vaccine attraction as a point — and a global response to covid-19. Difficult moral decisions that may – or, some say, should not be – were necessary to establish instead are pushed to the people.

“The city is the center of attention,” says Pamela Hieronymi, a philosopher at the University of California, Los Angeles. So if you have a problem with visitors coming to receive the vaccine, say, New York, “it seems that your complaint should be submitted to the city, not to the person using the prescribed line.”

Nicole Hassoun, a professor of philosophy at Binghamton University and director of the Global Health Impact Project, also said that although vaccinated visitors may struggle with their choices, the real problem is not with everyone. “I think the question is about what countries are doing and what they have and countries that continue to use it. [vaccines] for their own good, ”he says. “All over the world, it’s wrong.”

There could be other problems such as widening your inequality, says Yadurshini Raveendran, a graduate of the Duke Global Health Institute, who points out that low-income people – who travel around the world and thus take advantage of vaccine tourism – are already have more access to health care than the poorest in those lands. Israel has the highest vaccination in the world, he says, but Palestine has given one rate to only 5% of the population.

[ad_2]

Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Back to top button