Tech News

The rights of all parties may restrict high-level expertise to breach confidentiality

Individuals they do not have to fight for their privacy and be responsible for all the consequences of their digital actions. Think of it this way: people have a right to safe drinking water, but they are not encouraged to exercise that right by considering the type of water and the bomb every time they drink it. Instead, regulatory agencies act on behalf of everyone to ensure that all our water is safe. The same should be done with digital privacy: it is not something that most users are, or should be expected to be, worthy of protection.

There are two parallel approaches that should be followed in protecting people.

One is the effective use of teams or group activities, which are known as total improvement methods. Historically, this has been limited in Europe, but in November 2020 the European parliament passed you have exceeded which requires all 27 EU countries to adopt effective interventions for the whole group. Compared to the US, the EU has strict laws to protect consumer data and promote competition, so public or group litigation in Europe could be a powerful tool for lawyers and rights activists to force large corporations to change their practices, even if the costs are low. very much.

Classroom cases are often used in the US to seek economic collapse, but they can also be used to force change in systems and systems. They can work in conjunction with mind-altering meetings, especially on consumer issues (for example, forcing Big Cigarettes to accept a link between smoking and cancer, or for developing a driving policy). They are powerful weapons with thousands, if not millions, of the same damage, which helps to prove the cause. Part of the problem is finding the right information for the first time. Government efforts, such as the lawsuit filed on Facebook in December by a The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is a group of 46 countries, it is important. As professional journalist Gilad Edelman put it, “According to the lawsuit, long-term consumer encroachment is another way to destroy consumers – social networking sites that protect users from low and useless profits – which advise Facebook not to be the only one illegal.” US, according to the New York Times recent report, court hearings, including class cases, often “depend on the evidence presented by the state.” In the EU, however, there is another option: secret courts may open up regulatory mechanisms, which are hampered by differences between international law and international regulators.

Which brings us to the second approach: the well-known 2016 French law called the Digital Republic Bill. The program of Digital Republic Bill It is one of the few modern laws that focuses on decision-making. The Act currently applies only to the oversight of public bodies. But it does give a glimpse of what future laws may look like. It says that the code for launching such machines should be given to all people. Anyone can ask for this number.

Importantly, the law enables advocacy organizations to inquire more about the use of the algorithms and the code behind it even if it does not represent an individual or interviewer who claims to be injured. The need to find a “perfect complainant” who can confirm the injury to provide a suit makes it extremely difficult to deal with the complications that cause all the injuries. Laure Lucchesi, director of Etalab, France’s finance office, says the law’s focus is on current accounting. Some laws, such as the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), focus on acceptance and confidentiality. But all of these and algorithms need to be improved.

The need to find a “perfect complainant” who can confirm the injury to provide a suit makes it extremely difficult to deal with the complications that cause all the injuries.

apple It promises in another advertisement: “Right now, your phone has more privacy than your home. Your location, your messages, your heart rate when you run. These are private things. And it should be yours.” Apple promotes personal fraud: By failing to say that your phone saves more than just your readings, the company assures you that the most important thing comes from your dealings with your service providers and others. The idea that your phone is digital is like a counterfeit and fake cabinet. its value depends on the choices you make, which are stored on your phone – but that is not yours.

Google Fitbit Discovery is another example. Google promises to “not use Fitbit advertising,” but Google’s predictive value does not depend on the type of data. As the European economic group arguesd ) for all non-Fitbit (billions of them). ”The Google-Fitbit partnership is actually a partnership agreement.

The decision-makers must act

Experimental costs to fill the void in the United States. In 2019 Senators Cory Booker and Ron Wyden launched Experimental Law of Practice, which was suspended in Congress. The practice would require the industry to assess how they can contribute to certain issues to determine if they are discriminatory or discriminatory. But in the US the most important issue is the need to address the issue first and foremost in all aspects of medical care, while the risk of this change is increased due to the disruption of the epidemic in U.S. society.

Late January, a Public Health Emergency privacy policy was reinstated in the Senate by House of Representatives and Speakers Mark Warner and Richard Blumenthal. This can ensure that the data collected for public health purposes is no longer used. It may prohibit the use of health information in the form of discrimination, inconsistency, or distortion, including advertising, e-commerce, or attempts to obtain employment, finance, insurance, housing, or education. This could be a good start. Furthermore, the law that applies to sound decision-making, following the French example, should focus on accountability, strong data-driven decision-making, and the ability to monitor and evaluate decisions that affect the public.

Three things are needed to ensure a responsible response: (1) transparency about where certain elections are held and how they affect individuals and groups, (2) the right of people to give fair opinion and call those responsible to account, and (3) the ability to exercise sanctions. Effectively, policymakers will need to make choices, as predicted in the EU, that create a “high risk” that should be carefully monitored.

Remove Appearance

The key to public scrutiny in making decisions alone is the clear colors that lead to the answer. This includes revealing the existence of algorithms, their purpose, and the amount of studies behind them, as well as their impact — whether they have led to different outcomes, and which groups if any.

Public participation

People have the right to ask all who have power to make their decisions. “Right to seek answers” ​​should not be limited to discussions only, where people are asked to contribute and supervisors continue to make progress. This should include participation in power, where individuals must order before establishing risk mechanisms in public and private sectors.


Finally, the power of acceptance is essential for this change to take place and for the response to be achieved. It should be compelled to establish requirements for monitoring, evaluation, and correction, in order to provide readers with this information, and to empower regulatory agencies to enforce sanctions, not only to eliminate problems later but to prevent them.

The issue of the problems associated with knowledge affects everyone. Public health privacy policy is the first step. Congress should use the curriculum to enact legislation that would make laws that focus more on data freedom. It is through these mechanisms that the US can avoid situations in which advertising from information companies disrupts people’s access to housing, employment, credit, and other opportunities for years to come.

Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Back to top button