The problem of trusting the British prime minister

[ad_1]
It is often said that Boris Johnson’s weaknesses are bought off by voters, but suddenly even his allies start to question whether the price is too high. The minimum requirements for any elected leader are skill and perfection. However questions have piled up in recent days as the Prime Minister lied at a party held at 10 Downing Street last year in protest of a permanent ban, and misleading his ethics adviser by exploring how to do it. renovating his house was paid. In any case, Britain is now being manipulated by a man whose words were not reliable abroad, very unreliable. and his people, as well as the distrust of many of its counselors.
Johnson apologized to parliament last week after a video the instructors laugh about the Downing Street party when such meetings were banned last December, and many voters banned travel to visit their loved ones due to anti-Covid laws. The Prime Minister had for a week been pointing out that no party had taken place, and he insisted that all instructions be followed.
An investigation by the secretary of state from development to two other parties. Johnson must have been convinced that no laws had been broken. Whether he knew it or not, he argued in front of the parliament about events that were under his roof that it would be easier to get to the ground.
The fact that the lawmakers are violating it – and as Johnson knows – is very damaging to public opinion. Zandale, conflicting appearances between the findings of the Electoral Commission’s report on its complex reforms and the fact that Johnson told the chief of standards that it was dangerous. Lord Christopher Geidt is facing phone calls to reopen his investigation and says he is “not happy”, although he has done nothing to step down – which would have made him a leader. second support about the post to do so throughout the year.
This alone would be a major issue for any minister. But it comes just weeks after Johnson appeared to try to use his majority to undermine the parliamentary system to protect an MP who has been found to have violated anti-money laundering laws. And it follows the cavalier’s point of view on the rules, and the truth, on all of his work.
As Prime Minister, Johnson has played actively and freely with the legislature, having been criticized by the Supreme Court for attempting to start a five-week parliamentary session during the Brexit crisis. He has used the threats to break international law as a tool to connect with the EU, and to put his trust in his words, as well as in the UK, overseas.
The biggest danger now is that Johnson’s distrust could hinder the imposition of sanctions that are necessary to deal with the Omicron type of highly contagious. The Prime Minister is facing terrorists who leave him in need of Labor assistance to get through England’s “Plan B” standards, and greater rebellion by taking other paths. Johnson is fighting for his political future with the Tory MP, one of the most vocal and extremist Covid-skeptics.
The leadership problem in the midst of the spread of the virus can be the worst for the people. Followers can compete for the best antivirus, and the competition could mean a break for several weeks as party members vote.
Two years ago, the Tories made a pact to help a leader who has patent infringement because he felt he could win elections and “end Brexit”. Negative effects on North Shropshire by-elections this week could set in extreme stress on Johnson. But soon, Conservative advisers should address the question of whether the alliance has been too expensive – for them and the country.
[ad_2]
Source link



