[ad_1]
Applying these tips can make the internet more accessible. But more than 600 experts have signed up document asking web users not to use artificial intelligence tools, including AccessiBe. Signers include those who support W3C guidelines and employees at Microsoft, Apple, and Google. “Identifying and correcting problems is not reliable enough for the site to follow,” the document says, criticizing other sellers for “fraudulent business.”
The site was started by Karl Groves, a technical founder at Tenon.io, who provided a 35-page analysis of the AccessiBe program in Murphy’s case against Eyebobs. Groves said he searched nearly 1,000 pages from 50 pages using startup technology and found 2,300 violations of W3C guidelines on each page. Groves says this is very limited, because most devices can be supervised by an expert, manually analyzed. He says: “Artificial intelligence does not work that way.
In his AccessiBe report, Groves cited a photo of a white-collar model sold on ecommerce sites. Another quote, which appears to have been coined by AccessiBe technology, was “Grass Natural and summer.” In some cases, he added, AccessiBe failed to add text to forms and buttons.
On its landing page, AccessiBe promises “internet access”. Koma supporting documents warn customers that its machine learning expertise may not be able to accurately interpret the content of the page if “they have not experienced these things sufficiently.”
AccessiBe Relationship Manager, Joshua Basile, says that since joining the company earlier this year it has been working with disability rights groups and explained that it provides “manual adjustment” and automatic maintenance. “It’s an advanced technology and we’re doing well,” he said.
In a statement, AccessiBe chief marketing officer Gil Magen said the company reviewed the Eyebobs page and found that it matched the search results. AccessiBe supports clients in litigation but Eyebobs declined, the statement said.
In a statement, Eyebobs said AccessiBe failed to respond to requests for meetings with its lawyers and provided answers “confirming our online compliance.” Eyebobs will no longer work with AccessiBe and will not work in the future.
Although the establishment of Eyebobs, completed next year, does not include acknowledging that its site had problems, it requires the company to pay for external expert research and provide one or more employees to find work. “Eyebobs is committed to following the ADA and supporting all visitors who come to our site,” says marketing chief Megan McMoInau.
Haben Girma, a lawyer for the Disabled People’s Rights, says he hopes the Eyebobs suit will prevent companies from using AccessiBe or similar devices. He believes that professional or regulatory companies like the US Federal Trade Commission should take action against the misuse of illicit access to weapons. “Governments, Google, and social networking sites can stop the spread of lies,” he said.
Experts who oppose artificial intelligence often deny that the technology is useless. Instead, they say that relying too much on these programs is dangerous.
A 2018 paper and W3C staff appreciated the ability to use AI to help people with visual impairments or other needs and warned of its limitations. It points to a Facebook project using a learning tool to create image descriptions that are sent by users for example. The program won an award from the American Foundation for the Blind in 2017. But its definition may be difficult to interpret. Sassy Outwater-Wright, executive director of the Massachusetts Association for the Blind and Visual Impaired, found that the procedure sometimes reflects extreme concern for body parts— “two people standing, beard, feet, out, water” —which he called “beard” beard. ” . ”
[ad_2]
Source link
