On January 21, Facebook has asked the Oversight Board to reconsider their decision to permanently ban Donald Trump, and determine if he would allow the former President to resubmit. You can see it as a great achievement. For three years, Facebook has been setting up an independent non-profit organization to monitor its decisions. And now that the 20-member membership has just begun to hear cases, Facebook has brought out perhaps the most controversial idea for the company. Is Donald Trump back on TV, attacking those who don’t like him and claiming to win elections? Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg he was told her new bright board to make invitations.
But the team did not play. Proving that Facebook was right to suspend Trump’s account of his violent post on January 6, today summoned the company by making a fine that was not part of his mind – a permanent suspension. The council told Facebook to take six months to enforce its rules, and then make a decision to reinstate Trump.
Calling on reporters to monitor the release of the verdict, Stanford chairman and law professor Michael McConnell also said the council did not want to release Facebook. “We are not the police,” he said. “Our only goal is to catch up Facebook to answer a charge. ”
The outcome of the ruling means Trump will not be back on Facebook for a while. Many in the country will rest, and some continue to believe that the ban is part of a conspiracy. But the idea could be a good time in Facebook’s Supreme Court.
Facebook’s purpose in setting up the committee was to get outside voices to highlight the important decisions the company has to make on its content. By 2018, no one had trusted Facebook to make phone calls. And for good reason. When it comes to the most controversial groups, the way modern leaders have been most affected by politics and business. One of the strongest voices in the electoral chamber is the vice president of Facebook for global affairs Joel Kaplan, a former GOP member. Brett Kavanaugh’s friend. Finally, Zuckerberg, CEO, is well aware of how Facebook’s decisions affect his reputation and business prospects.
Zuckerberg joined the opposition in saying that no one should have the power to make decisions on a platform of three billion people. He set up a committee and funded it with $ 130 million, so that major decisions on Facebook and Instagram can be made public. beautiful pictures in human rights, politics, and the media instead. The board members quickly realized that their biggest challenge was to prove that they were truly independent of the company that formed the organization. His earlier decisions gave the impression that the relationship could turn into a conflict. One time Of the issues Facebook removed, Facebook told the committee to stop the discussion because it had changed the way it was removed and the issue was disrupted. The commission continued to investigate the matter.
Trump’s idea represents the clear notion that the committee would not be stupid on Facebook. Zuckerberg may have thought that, in determining whether Trump should return, the commission would review a number of Trump documents to confirm the decision. But the council’s approval of Facebook’s removal of January 6 posts was swift and unconstitutional. Trump’s spokespersons briefly gave the so-called “impossibility” that the former President’s actions could be seen as inciting violence, which is being criticized by the injured and dead at the Capitol. However, the committee’s mockery was less intense in Mar a Lago than in Menlo Park. “It’s a decision about Facebook and how it is used and not Trump’s,” Co-Co-chair and former Danish Prime Minister Helle Thorning-Schmidt told reporters. “Facebook has denied its responsibility.