[ad_1]
Before Halloween in 2013, Lina Khan He toured several selected sweets in the Safeway supermarket and came up with a confusing revelation.
About 40 sweets on the shelves only provide an option for the selectors; had only two or three confectioners. Khan, a minor investigator at the time, was so upset that wrote about it in Time magazine. “If we want a healthy, diverse market – and a variety of Halloween baskets – we can start and re-establish our anti-conflict laws.”
Khan’s strong corporate criticism went beyond Big Candy. He also highlighted the complexity of his practice and self-control in various groups ranging from airplanes to poultry and metal, I think the same. And he started teaching about his interest in the stock market The Great Way, eventually becoming one of the most prominent and influential critics.
That’s why Khan, who is only 32 years old, was this week chart U.S. Secretary of State Joe Biden to chair the Federal Trade Commission, the competition’s chief regulator, sent the shocks through Washington, Wall Street and Silicon Valley. The hope is that they will now try to establish a new era of anti-conflict in America.
“Now he has a role, and he should be afraid of him,” said Robert Kaminski, executive director of Capital Alpha Partners, a Washington-based think tank. “He has a hammer and all he sees is nails,” he adds.
Khan was born and raised in London, to Pakistani parents; the couple moved to the United States at the age of 11. The first sign of his interest in the company was unfair.
A Starbucks coffee shop across the street from his high school in Mamaroneck, northeast of New York City, was forbidding young people to sit down because it was too crowded. Later, Mr. Khan wrote in a school newspaper chosen by the New York Times.
Khan went on to Williams College, where he studied politics. After graduating, he arrived in Washington, with a job at the New America Foundation, a left-wing position, which allowed him to pursue business and competition.
“Where we had a lot of independent businesses, a lot of local, diverse businesses,” he said He said in 2012, “now we have just seen a few companies that control almost all industries.”
Khan eventually came to Yale Law School, and in January 2017 he published in the Yale Law Journal an article that could make him famous: “Anti-Antitrust in Amazon“.
The piece began to spread. Robert Hockett, a professor of law at Cornell University, said: “You may think it was the first case in a series of high-profile cases of corruption.”
At the heart of Khan’s philosophy is the idea that companies, including Amazon, have benefited from a relentless analysis over the years, at a time when low consumer prices have been a major factor in creating competition. He envisioned a different kind of government, similar to the one that existed in the early 20th century, when US officials did not hesitate to address it on their own.
Amazon declined to comment on its selection.
David Singh Grewal, professor of law at the University of California at Berkeley, said: “What they’re doing is just giving back the anti-market sentiment, from the 20’s to the 60’s, even the 70’s.”
People who know Khan – who is married to a psychiatrist – describe him as arrogant and careless.
“They still keep it a secret,” Grewal said. It’s easy to think of him as the face of the ‘millennium’, sometimes referred to as the ‘hipster,’ antitrust, but it’s very different from what happens to journalists.
After receiving his law degree, Khan became a professor in Columbia and also worked with the Open Markets Institute, an independent think tank in Washington. At Capitol Hill, he assisted in the research of the executive committee at Big Tech. Most Republicans are still smart. “His views on anti-corruption are also at odds with the legal system,” said Mike Lee, Utah Senator in March.
Khan’s responsibilities grew exponentially in the Democratic ranks, surpassing the likes of Big Tech extremists such as Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders as well as many politicians like Biden. However, while he was expected to secure a place at the FTC as a Commissioner, a few predicted that he would be appointed to head the commission.
“She has managed to climb faster. And I would say he was just a wonderful visionary, ”said Kate Judge, a professor at law school at University University.
Sarah Miller, executive director of the American Economic Liberties Project, calls Khan “Simone Biles” an antagonist, referring to an American Olympic athlete who broke down. “Demonstrating that the United States has a serious prison problem.
[ad_2]
Source link
