Yoshihide Suga after promising that After burning Japanese air by 2030, the Prime Minister was received warmly by world leaders at a meeting on Joe Biden’s season. But his announcement brought fear to the Japanese office.
Making a decision in Japan often requires a slow and painful process to make an agreement. Meanwhile, Suga has promoted the target – 46% reduction from 2013 levels by 2030 – without question, political dialogue and possible analysis are possible.
Officials are now rushing to change the new goal, with experts openly questioning their loyalty and warning that the Japanese people have not been appreciated for their commitment.
In a statement taken as a signal of the government’s unpreparedness, Shinjiro Koizumi, the environment minister, criticized and insulted the media when he told a television program that 46% of people were “just floating around”.
“The government is in complete disarray,” said one of the consultants working on a power plan. “Japan has done nothing to prepare for this.”
Suga has made climate change and the promise of “green growth” is in the midst of his government from the very beginning began work Last September. In October, he promised Japan to make 20% carbon-free.
But this new goal has caused confusion because it is urgent. Japan has already promised a 26% reduction compared to 2013 levels by 2030. An increase of 46% would require a significant reduction in emissions in just nine years.
Taishi Sugiyama, executive director of the Canon Institute for Global Study, said the new goal could only be achieved if Japan approved its economy. A 1% drop in gas costs about ¥ 1tn ($ 9.2bn) per year, he said, meaning a 20% reduction costs ¥ 20tn.
This equates to about 3.5% of global yields, meaning that the carbon target of Japan’s economic reforms is expected by 2030.
Takeo Kikkawa, a professor at the International University of Japan and a member of the state-run power agency, said the 46% target was good. “The problem is that the resistance in the past was very small, that’s not true,” he said.
By the target of 2030, Japan should have considered purchasing foreign passports, Kikkawa said. But, he added, “we can move forward and still achieve the 2050 net zero goal”.
Japan’s efforts to reduce emissions were followed by the results of Nuclear accident at Fukushima in 2011. After three nuclear meltdown, Japan took all its nuclear vessels out and burned coal and oil instead.
This prompted Japan to change its fiscal year to reduce emissions in 2013 in the Paris Agreement, instead of 1990 under the Kyoto protocol, and provide a basic basis for how to use it.
An easy way to reduce emissions is to re-establish nuclear weapons in Japan. “But even if they start all over again, they will not be able to reduce their oxygen intake,” Sugiyama said.
Nuclear is also unpopular with the Japanese people. The government is reluctant to force a resumption or negotiation on behalf of the existing machines at the end of their working life.
Where climate change meets business, markets and politics. See the FT publication here
Environmentalists are calling for a significant increase in renewable energy sources, which generate about 6% of Japan’s electricity output by 2019. Emerging effects have tripled since the Fukushima disaster but Japan’s mountainous regions make it difficult to develop large solar and wind farms.
Many experts, therefore, are hoping for their future in the sale of electric power appliances such as ammonia or hydrogen, produced using renewable energy in countries such as Australia, burning using natural gas and coal in Japan. However, such renewable fuel equipment is not available.
Many Japanese policies have been implemented through support companies, as well as solar energy taxes. The ruling Liberal Democratic Party opposes the use of gas trade or carbon taxes but Japanese political analysts oppose the proposals that could make power cheaper.