Business News

Gates’ sympathizers see a change in the legal status of the divorce

The foundations of Bill Gates and Melinda French Gates plan to bring its administration back after a billionaire family divorce, a few weeks later states that there is no such change.

The program of Bill & Melinda Gates Council, which has allocated $ 55bn since its inception in 2000, differs from most major projects in that it has no independent regulators.

On the contrary, it has been run by three trustees: Gates, French Gates and Warren Buffett, chairman of Berkshire Hathaway who promised in 2006 to give up his $ 110bn investment earlier.

“I am in a hurry to discuss with Bill and Melinda what they and Warren can do to promote stability and stability in the world as a result of the divorce of their roommates,” Mark Suzman, head of the agency, told The Wall Street. reports that the French Gates encouraged legal reform.

When the couple announced in early May that they were dissolving a marriage that was described as irrevocable, the council ruled that “there is no plan to change or the organization is ready”.

Suzman’s statement did not imply a change in attitude towards the lower order or details of what its governments would look like in the future.

“He didn’t choose anything,” he said. “Bill and Melinda have reaffirmed their commitment to the foundation and continue to work together for our cause. These discussions are part of their wise thinking for the future.”

Expected divorce has raised questions about the world’s largest employer, which employs 1,600 people and provides over $ 5bn a year, especially in health and development projects.

Most of the $ 124 billion Gates created to be Microsoft’s developers has not yet been established, and the divorce has fueled speculation that the remaining billions of dollars could be paid to provide for cars with him and French Gates working independently.

Mu interview and the Financial Times shortly before announcing the divorce, the French Gates said the couple kept their disputes out of the decision-making process.

“Are we not in agreement? Sometimes, yes, we do. But what we. . . committed many years ago on the basis of the fact that we would have the same conflicts outside the foundation, resolve them and come to the foundation as leaders with one voice, ”he said.

Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Back to top button