In collaboration with the Omidyar Network, MIT Technology Review Insights spoke with leading financial analysts, including researchers, lawyers, and economists at organizations such as Open Data Institute, Yale University, and Microsoft Research, to see how inconsistencies, causes, and opinions are expressed. and the tools available to solve it. The main findings of the report are:
Material wealth is very different.
Critics believe that the internet — which was thought to be a way to change things in public — has been dominated by a small group of knowledgeable technicians, as well as “counting tools” that support it, leading to unequal exchanges in which data managers benefit most. The challenge for data freedom advocates, economists, and governments is to devise ways to destroy the economy so that all organizations can benefit more from data transformation.
Data is a new tool that requires new tools to calculate its value and identify participants.
The power of this type is relative and extensive, it comes from participants and users who are often unaware of their contributions to the “data center”, and are often not paid fairly. We need more tools to understand the form and form of information.
Resolving data losses is a major challenge for all.
New ways of resolving economic disputes often stem from government interventions, such as legislative change, to action led by government agencies, where “data management” can be promoted through organizations such as trusts, corporations, and corporations, which empower people to regulate. Overall, more ideas need to be included in any digital economic experiment.
This was created by Insights, the hand of material contained in the MIT Technology Review. It was not written by the authors of the MIT Technology Review.