[ad_1]
In 2001, when Pediatrician Gideon Lack asked a group of about 80 parents in Tel Aviv if their children did not get peanuts, with only two or three hands raised. The shortage was a surprise. Back in the UK, peanut allergies were one of the most common among children. When comparing the incidence of peanuts among Israeli children with the number of Jewish children in the UK, the UK population was ten times higher. Was there anything in Israel – healthy food, plenty of time in the sun – that suppressed peanut butter?
He later found out that most of the children in Israel started eating Bamba, the only cake, as soon as they finished eating solid foods. Can the early extraction of seeds explain? The idea has never happened to anyone because it seems to be wrong. For years, pediatricians in the UK, Canada, Australia, and the United States have been urging parents to refrain from giving nuts to children until they are 1 year old, as they believe that early detection will end add risk of infection. The American Academy of Pediatrics also included this advice on infant counseling.
Shortage and peer pressure began to prepare for medical tests that could take until 2015 to complete. The study, published in New England Journal of Medicine, some children are given peanut protein at an early age while others wait until the first year. Children in the first group had a 81% lower risk of early immunizations at the age of 5. All previous recommendations, made by committee experts, may have unknowingly contributed to an increase in peanut tuberculosis.
As a doctor, my results did not change. Prior to the release, I advised the new parent to prevent her daughter from avoiding high-energy foods such as peanut protein. When I look back, I often feel guilty. What if he now had a peanut problem?
The fact that medical knowledge is constantly evolving is a challenge for physicians and patients. It may be as if medical information comes with self-denial: “True… for now.”
Teachers of medical schools Sometimes it is a joke that half of what students learn will be old by the time they graduate. Half is often used in medical devices (CPGs), and has real-life effects.
CPG, which is usually made up of specialist committee members from specialized organizations, is present in almost every patient’s diagnosis. Although the instructions are not rules, are more frequent and more likely to be involved in drug trafficking.
As medical knowledge changes, guidelines change. Hormone therapy, for example, has long been a gold standard for adolescents who are struggling with symptoms such as fever and mood swings. Then, in 2013, a Women Health Initiative trial showed that the drug could be more dangerous than previously thought, and many guidelines were changed.
Also, for many years, more than 40 women have been encouraged to receive annual mammograms – until a new study in 2009 showed that preliminary screening, however, results in unnecessary biopsies without reducing breast cancer mortality. Regular mammograms are now said to be mainly for more than 50 women, each year.
Therapeutic changes often occur gradually, after a number of studies have changed the old mindset. The Covid-19 has accelerated them, making them all look good and unstable. In the past, even some medical professionals have given coronavirus-like weaker than the common cold, its actual hardening was described in detail. For a while, people were told not to bother with masks, but then they were advised to give it a try two masking. Some countries are extending time between the first and second vaccines. Obviously, the epidemic, as well as how we know it, has been constantly changing. However, in the last year and a half, we have all experienced the same whiplash.
It is too early to say how these changes could affect patients’ perceptions of medical services. On the one hand, seeing open debate among medical professionals can give people a better understanding of how medical knowledge changes. It can also equip us with eternal doubts. In 2018, researchers analyzed 50-year-old research lighting trust the medicine. In 1966, 73 percent of Americans said they relied on “medical leaders.” By 2012 the figure had dropped to 34 percent — among other things, the authors speculated, due to the lack of all medical procedures.
[ad_2]
Source link
