[ad_1]
In 2016, Columbus, Ohio, beat up 77 other small and medium-sized cities in the US on a $ 50 million pot This is also done to shape his future. Administration Department Smart City Problem It was the first competition of its kind, designed as a leap to jump to the transformation of one city of technology that was suddenly everywhere. Hail companies love it Uber and Upload they were exalted, car sharing companies like Car2Go were elevating their reputation, as well as autonomous vehicles it seemed to be right there in the corner.
“The way we want to work is flexible,” the city wrote in a statement, saying that it will focus on helping the most densely populated areas in the city. It developed plans to test Wi-Fi hotspots to help people plan trips, pay for buses and hail prices and find parking, autonomous, and motor-connected connections.
Five years later, the Smart City Challenge is over, but this change is yet to come. According to the final report of the project, released this month by the Smart Columbus Program, the epidemic broke out as other projects began. The six warehouses set up around the city were used to accommodate eight trips between July 2020 and March 2021. EasyMile Company launched an independent fleet in February 2020, carrying passengers on trips within 4 miles per hour. Fifteen days later, he suddenly broke down sent a passenger to the hospital, to stop work. The car’s operation was terminated. Only 1,100 people have downloaded the program, called Pivot, to plan and reserve high-speed rail journeys, motorbikes and scooters, as well as government transportation.
The distinction between the promise of whiz-bang technology and reality in Columbus reflects the shift from technology as a silver bullet, as well as new concerns about the problems that online services can bring on the streets of IRL. The “smart city” was a complex marketing campaign that was linked to the city’s hopes. Today, as citizens we pay close attention to technology monitoring, the concept of a sensor in every home doesn’t look as bright as it used to be.
However, Columbus officials insist that the Smart City project was not a failure. Instead, the final report said the project was a success. Now Columbus wants to reconsider the time of the slide.
“It doesn’t have to be a competition for more sensors, or anything like that, and I think we were a little bit confused at some point,” said Jordan Davis, CEO of Smart Columbus, an organization that oversees the continuation of this challenging project. . Other activities of this problem will continue. Mr Davis said his aim should be, “How can we use expertise to improve the quality of life, tackle social problems, reduce climate change, and achieve hope in the region?”
Consider going back to 2015, and those challenging technical goals were understandable. The future was fast approaching, and DOT hoped that its seed money would help a middle-class city like Columbus to work with companies to plan for the future, and think critically. In selecting the city, the department said it was impressed by the number of local companies that had promised to support the project. The problem “is to use… high-quality tools to improve the quality of life of all people, especially those living in isolated areas,” says author Anthony Foxx. (He is now the general manager of Lyft.)
It is now clear that private companies cannot predict the future of cities and may not be interested in them. Davis says Columbus’ election brought ideas from companies that eventually became difficult to manage, and “sometimes confused.” So far, Uber (and Lyft) have it were released in autonomous vehicles, especially after testing the Uber car struck and killed a pedestrian in Arizona. Google’s brother Road Labs promised in 2017 to create future accommodation in Toronto. But killed the project last year amid the scourge and a difficult political war with the civil rights activists and local groups and developers.
However, smart urban projects are still evolving around the world. Toyota it forms a car-loving group outside of Tokyo. Traffic is just announced advises landlords in a few US cities on “plans for innovation.” And Alibaba “smart traffic” operations continue to China, Malaysia, and Macau.
In the end, the evolution of smart cities in Columbus may have demanded more prominence from the beginning. “A lot of people were expecting a lot of work, and probably a lot more,” says Harvey Miller, a professor of geography and director of the Center for Urban and Regional Analysis at Ohio State University, who helped design and evaluate the problem. He also said that $ 50 million ($ 40 million from the federal government, $ 10 million from Microsoft’s late founder Paul Allen’s Vulcan Inc.) is not a lot of money, especially the spread over five years. It is not wrong for Columbus that companies promise that soon there will be only self-driving cars.
[ad_2]
Source link
