[ad_1]
Younger. Disappointed. Odd. There are many words used in this context legal disputes based on an unnamed bullet trainer, arriving late at a depot in western Japan and ¥ 43 ($ 0.37) his boss dropped his paycheck.
The word that seems to be absent in all of this, however, is “selling”.
Because the case, which was violently contested on small battlefields, culminated in the loss of jobs and a profound revelation of Japan’s modern working environment, has also given the country an astonishing amount of value in one of the world’s largest capitals.
That ¥ 43 – both tragic and painful – stands as a sign of negligence in the highly successful business sector. In light of this, ¥ 43 has emerged as the lowest price in Japan with a high-speed rail system that saves time and quantity becoming the envy of the world.
The lawsuit, which has been the subject of much controversy in recent weeks, stems from what happened in June last year, and which (some critically criticize, some say recklessly) did not cause any harm to passengers.
The driver of the West Japan Railway Company (JR West), whose job that day was to board an empty train from the platform to the depot, realized that he was expecting the wrong platform. When he realized the problem, it took him a minute to run to the right platform and the delayed transfer caused a minute delay to get to the parking lot.
JR West, which operated 378 locomotives per day in 2020 and delayed the end of the entire 12-second year, imposed ¥ 85 on the driver’s salary to pay for two minutes which, according to the company, was not professionally operational. The driver, citing the faults of the people and stating that he had not resigned, appealed to the local labor office and saw that the sentence was reduced to ¥ 43 minutes of inactivity running in the middle of the platform and changing due to his error.
But the driver, still unhappy, is accusing JR West of not only ¥ 43, but also the extra time ¥ 13 and even more (even less) ¥ 2.2m is a waste of all mental suffering.
Much of this story is obvious. It is very interesting, in a work environment that expects (or hardly) many employees to work unpaid “overtime” work, which JR West has chosen to measure, or its absence, in one-minute increments. How far would all Japanese companies go if they failed to maintain a long-term printery or a wrong trip to the wrong place after being fined and fined for working hours? And if the minutes are considered large enough to be punitive, why are they still considered small as extra pay units?
Interestingly, despite the driver’s protests and the cybercrime screams of corporate violence, it is a question of why JR West did wrong with such a small penalty. The facts show that the driver who was charged with driving a vehicle that was constructed at a speed of 320km / h and following a strict procedure was wrong. This error may have occurred without serious consequences but occurred in a place where, obviously, some may not.
If JR West was revealed to keep its employees free of defamation and metal fines – let’s say a month’s pay in cases like this – we can say that the usual punctuality was tied up in a cowardly regime. That authority may exist, but this incident illustrates that a lesser punishment might be needed to bring about a measure of dread.
This leaves a very difficult source of motivation – which can be explained by the fact that, in the world of robots, JR West (like its middle and eastern counterparts in Japan) always ranks high among Japan’s most important school recruits and graduates university education. There is a perception that Japanese railway companies have been turning this concern into a misunderstanding among workers.
Over the past few weeks, railway companies have been able to double the price by saying that workers should be thankful for their work. Last week, JR East tested an independent railway on a commercial route and was considered “human”.
All of which would explain how the cha 43 penalty ensures that the annual delay is measured in seconds. The sheer number of drivers’ violent protests shows that small financial sanctions – perhaps with a number of threats that can be altered by robots – are fraudulent.
[ad_2]
Source link
