[ad_1]
What about us? We are 3 billion, after all. What if every Facebook user chose to be a good, thoughtful, knowledgeable, kind, gentle, and patient person? We have been working on humanity for at least 2,000 years, and it is not going well. There is no reason to believe, even if we have “media media” or “media literacy” to test young people in a few rich countries, that we can rely on social change – especially when Facebook was created to exploit our inherent goodness, ideas, and exaggeration. .
Facebook was made for better animals than humans. It was designed to create things that do not hate, oppress, oppress, or intimidate each other – such as goldsmiths. But we humans are bad animals. That is why we need to improve and refine our technologies to meet our weaknesses. The challenge is to figure out how to get it right.
First, we must note that Facebook’s risk is not in the other aspects of its marketing or the type of content it shares. It is one of the first things Zuckerberg has established in all aspects of his company: a commitment to continuous growth and participation. It is supported by a spread analysis that Facebook uses to track ads and content.
In particular, with the whole reason for Facebook, our ability to think together.
This means we cannot force a political party for Donald Trump to use Facebook to support him in 2016 or for Donald Trump to be removed from Facebook in 2021 or even though Facebook directly contributed to the expulsion and assassination of Rohingya people in Myanmar. We cannot encourage people to think that Facebook is the most popular and compelling in the online advertising market. We are unable to explain the difficulties of Section 230 of the Communication Decency Act and expect any agreement on what we can do in this regard (or even a change in this policy would make a difference to Facebook). Nothing is enough.
Facebook is dangerous because of the number of 3 billion people who are constantly being monitored, and then having social, cultural, and political identities driven by short-term predictions that are relevant to all events, ups and downs. The problem is not that one piece or the president is popular on Facebook in one corner of the globe. The problem with Facebook and Facebook.
Facebook has to be very strong – or even more – for many years. That’s why as we strive to get better at it (and each other), let’s all spend it for the next few years and focus on the most transformative program. We need to hit the roots of Facebook (and, right there, Google). In particular, there is one recent approach to intervention, albeit a small one, that would be a good first step.
In 2018 the European Union began to demand that all data collection companies respect the rights of citizens. The administers the General Data Protection Regulation it gives users the freedom to be independent of many of the products we make, and it also encourages less display when used. While coercion has been spotless, and the most visible sign of the GDPR has been additional warnings that require us to go back to approving the word, this rule provides an opportunity to limit the power of major issues such as Facebook and Google. It needs to be carefully studied, encouraged, and spread around the world. If the US Congress (and the parliaments in Canada, Australia, and India) take citizenship rights more seriously than they do with what they have, there can be hope.
[ad_2]
Source link
