[ad_1]
Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Republican whose credentials have made her one of the most outspoken members of the US Congress, was banned on Twitter after she repeatedly wrote about the epidemic.
A lawsuit against a Georgia-based congresswoman is expected to throw in a Twitter crash to make sure her show resumes, almost a year after her ban was imposed on the then president. Donald Trump struck a violent storm from the right.
Twitter announced Greene’s ban on Sunday, the day he tweeted about what he said was “the biggest death toll from the Covid vaccine”.
The company said it had launched the Covid-19 scandal last year after “persistent conspiracy theories, false rumors in research or credible reports, as well as numerous false stories and unsubstantiated rumors” that could prevent people from making decisions and plots. they are in danger.
It informing a more comprehensive system of penalties, called “strikes”, against offenders. The most severe punishment – a lifetime ban – is imposed on the fifth strike, or the case for spreading false information.
Twitter made a fourth decision against Greene last August, which led to a 7-day ban, when it falsely claimed the vaccine was “failed”.
The ban also applies to Greene’s Twitter account, @mtgreenee, but he leaves his home account, @RepMTG, unaffected. “We have made it clear that, in accordance with our policy of abolishing the policy, we will suspend accounts for repeated violations of the rules,” the company said.
Taylor Greene commented on a Telegraph program on Sunday criticizing what he said was Twitter’s failure to take action against Democrats who violated its policies. He added: “I take my stand for the truth and for the people. We will win! ”
Twitter actions are repeatedly following the call for Republicans to end it Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which provides protection for online companies when they remove content. He claims that the TV media has used it to prevent Republicans from speaking out in favor of Democrats.
Democrats have also called for a change of Section 230, even for controversial reasons, stating that the law should be tightened so that companies are held accountable if they do not engage in serious misconduct against fraud and harassment on their sites.
[ad_2]
Source link
