Check on Facebook The Board is often referred to as Facebook’s “Supreme Court”. On Wednesday, it did something like this – and handed down a definite verdict that posed the most difficult question that Mark Zuckerberg answered.
The problem in front of the board, if you haven’t opened an account or looked at Twitter this week, was to help Facebook’s permanent ban The story of Donald Trump following his actions in sparking the January 6 riots at the Capitol. As such, it was an obvious choice in the childhood of the Oversight Board. Since the company submitted the matter to the agency on January 21, it has received more than 9,000 public comments on the matter. As of Wednesday, Trump’s ban was still in place – but the election was not final.
In particular, Facebook asked the Oversight Board to do the following:
Considering what Facebook did, especially its commitment to voice obedience and security, it made the right decision on January 7, 2021, to block Donald J. Trump’s chances of posting Facebook and Instagram content for a long time?
The council answered yes — and no. Yes, Facebook was right to suspend Trump’s account; no, it was wrong to do so forever. “By imposing an unreasonable punishment, and then submitting the matter to the Board for resolution, Facebook wants to avoid its responsibilities,” he wrote. election. “The Board has rejected Facebook’s request and insisted that Facebook use it and impose an sanction.” In other words, Facebook has to decide whether to bring Trump right away, set a deadline for his suspension, or remove him from the platform forever.
While the council blamed Facebook for refusing to take a clear view, it also accepted the idea of the content. The program of first choice to open Trump’s account happened miraculously. With the recent violence at the U.S. Capitol, Trump has written a number of articles, including a video, in which he told his supporters to go home – but in the same way he has falsely claimed that the election was rigged, the very idea of encouraging his violent supporters. “This was a fraudulent decision, but we cannot play in the hands of these people,” he said in a statement. “We must have peace. Then go home. We love you. It is very important. By the next day, Facebook had downloaded the text and completely suspended Trump from his platform, as well as Instagram and WhatsApp. (Twitter and YouTube did the same.)
It was always clear that the allegations were not so bad for Trump – in fact, he told the oppressors to go home – and he did not break any clear-cut rules. Trump was using Facebook to spread the rumor of his election robbery for several months. What changed was not what Trump did online, then, but the consequences. Mu blog post explaining the Facebook Elections, Mark Zuckerberg noted the realization. “We removed this yesterday because we saw that what was happening – perhaps their purpose – could lead to violence,” he wrote. Although the platform tolerated Trump, “the situation here is very different, including the use of our platform to promote a dangerous uprising against a democratically elected government.” Trump will remain banned “forever and for the next two weeks until the peace of power ends.”
The idea was to move surprisingly away from Facebook’s popular method of slowing down in two ways. First, the company did not focus on the record, but on the situation. Second, it deviated from its “readiness for policy” legislation which gives politicians the right to violate the law, thinking that people need to know what they are talking about.