The Supreme Court has ruled that ‘F — school’ is free to speak in the case of student Snapchat students

The program of The Supreme Court ruled today that a high school in Pennsylvania violated a student’s First Amendment right by suspending him from the support team, following a Snapchat post criticizing the school with abusive language. The ruling sets a high standard for schools that punish students for talking about school, which is common today with social networking sites such as Snapchat. The Supreme Court ruled in the lower court, which found that the school, Mahoney Area High School, had violated Brandi Levy’s first Amandi rights.

After failing to form a varsity cheerleading team in 2017, Levy sent two Snapchat messages to a friend while visiting the same store. “F— school f— softball f— fun f – anything,” he wrote in his first message, According to CNBC. She wrote her next message with “Love how me and [another student] told that we want jv year before we do varsity but tha[t] does it matter to anyone else? And of course, it’s paired with a smiling emoji face.

“While public schools may be interested in improving the performance of some students, what these schools have provided is not enough to deal with BLs. [Brandi Levy’s] he is interested in expressing his views on the matter, “Supreme Court Judge Stephen Breyer wrote.

But when it comes to these cases, Breyer wrote that the school did not eliminate the three-way communication system for schools. First, schools do not tend to take the place of educated parents when they are out of school. In addition, the courts should be skeptical about whether schools are trying to improve school speech, as it allows them to experience any difficulties a student may have throughout the day. In conclusion, Breyer wrote that public schools also have a vested interest in protecting Free Speech, as they also serve as “democratic nurseries.”