[ad_1]
Political leaders have said so I have been trying to emulate the high magic of Silicon Valley since it was made with a microchip. Charles de Gaulle, then French president, visited Palo Alto in his revolutionary limousine in 1960. The president of the Russian Federation Dmitri Medvedev wore a casual business to meet the tweets and tycoons of Valley social in 2010. Hundreds of interested delegates, unusual and domestic, visited in the middle. “Silicon Valley,” said founder and entrepreneur Robert Metcalfe, once said, “is the only place in the world that is not trying to figure out how to become Silicon Valley.”
In the US, too, leaders have been trying for a long time to create another Silicon Valley. Yet billions of dollars in tax breaks and the “Silicon Something” advertising campaign in the aftermath, no place has ever equated with a history of solid manufacturing and investment financing – and these efforts have often benefited multinational corporations beyond the same regions. Wisconsin pledged $ 4 billion in tax revenues and subsidies to Taiwanese Foxconn’s electronics manufacturers in 2017, only to see a $ 10 billion factory plan and 13,000 jobs collapse after hundreds of millions of dollars in taxes had already been spent in preparation for Foxconn’s arrival. Amazon’s 2017 search for the second world capital had 238 U.S. cities collapsed to attract one of the world’s richest companies with taxes and subsidies, only to see HQ2 go to two places that Amazon would have chosen because of their past expertise. talent. One of the winners, Northern Virginia, promised Amazon up to $ 773 million in state and local corporate corporations – the public price for high-profile high-rise towers as Amazon joins other professional giants in pushing for permanent back office plans.
Although the American technology companies are much larger than ever, the list of high-end groups – Bay Area, Seattle, Boston, Austin – has not changed much since the days of 64K computers and floppy disks. Even the outbreak of the Covid-19 plague is he has done little to change this surprisingly static and very unbalanced tech geography.
However, politicians are trying again. Bills running through Congress include US Innovation and Competition Act (USICA), which has significant investment in the use of research, $ 10 billion in new facilities and grants to establish “new manufacturing facilities, and $ 52 billion to boost domestic production.” The Do Better to Do It which now fights the Senate building includes $ 43 billion in economic development programs in the region. These standards emphasize saving money during tax breaks, and investing more economic means of transport than the US has in recent decades. They promise. But they are only the beginning.
You do not have to travel far to Silicon Valley to find a techno-libertarian announcing that the success of the region is due to the chaos of the business and that the best thing the government can do is leave. But this theory ignores history. In fact, public spending contributed to the growing economy in Silicon Valley, Seattle, Boston, and Austin. To understand how this happened it is important to consider where the technology can grow.
During World War I II, the gathering of people and things that the US government was unparalleled also created an American economic map. The much-disrupted Midwest rallies rumbled through government-controlled lives, removing Jeeps and tanks instead of public transportation. Scientists and technologists alike are abandoning full-time research projects in order to join the “military force” of war. Many took part in a secret mission to build an atomic bomb, living in new territories built by the military in far-flung places of anonymity: the desert of New Mexico, the arid valleys of Eastern Washington, the pits of the countryside. Tennessee.
World War II was an attempt to use government funds to promote scientific progress and to revitalize the region’s economy. The Cold War was on the rise. The loss of military spending that diminished at the end of the war returned in the early 1950’s between the new atomic arms race against the Soviet Union and the Korean War. Walk around the American university today, note the number of scientific buildings built in the 1950s and 1960s, and you can see the results of concrete.
Originally, the areas at the top of the modern high-rise were located on the East Coast; Boston was the world’s largest economy in the 1980s. The region that eventually ousted Boston from its prestigious position was, before the war, known as the capital of prune. One of the things that made Silicon Valley’s future different from its agricultural counterparts was Stanford University, which had excellent engineering programs and a small number of students who were just looking at the starting glass nearby.
[ad_2]
Source link
