Your body is goldmine data. From the way you look to the way you think and feel, companies working in the fastest-growing companies are developing new and innovative ways to streamline everything we do. And, often, you may not even know you are being followed.
But the business of biometrics is taking a risk with European security experts. All European Data Protection Supervisors, acting as an independent EU body, and the European Data Protection Board, which helps countries implement the GDPR continuously, have called for a complete ban on the use of AI to identify individuals.
“Establishing remote sensing in public places means the end of anonymity in those places,” the leaders of the two bodies, Andrea Jelinek and Wojciech Wiewiórowski, wrote in connected words in late June. AI should not be used in public places for facial recognition, gait recognition, fingerprints, DNA, words, key connections, and other biometric forms, he said. There should also be a ban on attempts to predict race, gender, politics or sexual orientation and AI.
But such calls are contrary to EU AI regulations. Rules, which were revealed in April, states that “remote biometric detection” is at high risk — meaning that it is permitted but faces more robust controls than other AI applications. EU politicians have spent years discussing AI rules and biometric monitoring has already become one of the biggest challenges. When introduced, these rules will outline how hundreds of millions of people will be screened in the coming years. And the debate begins now.
Facial recognition has been a competition for many years, but the real explosion of biometrics focuses on other parts of your body. Across the 27 member states of the EU, several companies have been developing and deploying biometric technology that, in some cases, serves as a predictor of race and ethnicity and realizing how they feel. Often the technology is already being used in real life. However, the use of AI to create these sections can be both scientific and ethical. Such technologies pose a risk of breach of public privacy or personal choice.
Take Herta Security and VisionLabs, for example. All of these companies develop face recognition technology for a wide range of applications and are said to be commissioned by law enforcement agencies, retailers, and logistics. Documents from Herta Security, located in Barcelona, says its customers includes police in Germany, Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, as well as airports, casinos, stadiums, shopping malls and hotel chains such as Marriott and Holiday Inn.
Opponents claim that both Herta Security and VisionLabs claim that certain aspects of their systems can be used to pursue confidential information. “Most of the machines, even those used for human identification, rely on potentially dangerous groups such as clusters,” said Ella Jakubowska, a legal adviser looking at biometrics in the information group at European Digital Rights. The group is conducting a campaign to ban biometric control across Europe.
BioMarketing, a Herta Security face recognition tool, says it is a way for shopkeepers and advertisers to learn about their customers and is able to “remove” everything from the age of men and women to wearing glasses, even looking at their faces. Herta Security says the technology is “good” for advertising or helping companies understand their customers. The weapon, Herta Security says, could also divide people into “ethnic groups.” Under the GDPR, personal information identifying “ethnic or racial” groups is considered to be complex, with a profound focus on how it can be applied.
Jakubowska allegedly accused Herta Security chief of using racial slurs last year and that since then the company has withdrawn the request for its products. It is not known if the feature has been removed from the same tool. Corporate Notes possessing the third group still registers a group type as one of the features that can be accessed using BioMarketing. Corporate Notes since 2013 added that it is reviewing “color” before changing color. Herta Security, which has received more than $ 500,000 from the EU and has been awarded the EU’s guarantee of excellence, has not responded to a request for comment.
Source link
