[ad_1]
As Apple continues to struggle to keep its new secret announcements until they are ready to be unveiled on stage, a new report has revealed more. interesting information about the rumors that have been known about the company for a long time earphone, including the fact that it can be a standalone product and not rely on the iPhone.
All MacRumors and 9 to 5mc says they have seen a recent research report compiled by Apple Expert Ming-Chi Kuo for retailers who incorporate new Apple head-to-head designs that appear to be in conflict. another old report in September. The report was cited unknown sources say that the headphone processor was ready to test but it may not be as powerful as the processors used on Apple’s existing devices such as the iPad, iPhone, and MacBook. As a result, it was believed that Apple’s earphone would depend on the learning capabilities of the processor in another device, if tethered iPhone, the reason additional shortcuts and real mixes, and can work as a cable display.
On the contrary, Ming-Chi Kuo, an Apple analyst with a proven track record of the company’s inventions, instead predicted that Apple AR would be by the end of 2022 and would be operated by processors: one to hold “computer-related computers” and one by one. everything “will have the same computer power as the Mac M1. Why did he add strength to the horses? Kuo believes that this is because the headphones should be on at the same time adjusting live feeds from visual sensors than even Types of iPhone Pro should be:
Apple’s AR headset requires a different processor as the computer power of the sensor is much higher than that of the iPhone. For example, an AR earphone requires at least 6-8 optical modules to simultaneously deliver continuous video-viewing through AR functions to users. In comparison, the iPhone requires three transparent modules that run simultaneously and do not require continuous use of computers.
The use of an M1-caliber processor will also increase the head-to-head capability helping to differentiate it from product competition can do. But more importantly, as has been the case with some real and intricate products, consumers do not really need headphones that rely on more expensive equipment. Oculus Go and Quest sales were very popular not because they were cheap. No need for a game PC or a high-end mobile phone to work. Unlike the Apple Watch which is the second handheld iPhone screen, the AR or ML headphone should provide very different information, and based on its words, this is what Apple plans to offer by the end of next year.
[ad_2]
Source link
