[ad_1]
Samsung Electronics’ emissions and reduction of scientific fuel shortages are undermining the group’s demands, according to environmental experts.
Criticism comes at a time when companies are being closely monitored by climate change and climate change concerns, where organizations are moving beyond their environmental implications.
“Everyone has an ESG trial, everyone is talking… But we don’t see any real change,” said Youn Sejong, head of Solutions for Our Climate, a Seoul-based non-governmental organization.
Samsung is one of the world’s largest manufacturers of computers, smartphones, smartphones and electronics. The South Korean group has stated that its greenhouse gas emissions increase by 5% annually by 2020.
The company also relies on oil for more than 80% of its electricity, according to Greenpeace, an environmental watchdog.
This has raised questions about Samsung’s climate change experiments despite the group claiming that its US, European and Chinese pages are now using renewable energy.
Samsung declined to comment.
The problem the company is changing is highlighted by South Korea and Vietnam, its largest manufacturing facilities, where electricity remains dependent on coal.
Samsung has been pressuring Seoul and Hanoi to speed up access to digital markets that are demanding more money.
Samsung wants to be able to buy power from over-the-counter autonomous generators, through slow-moving power units.
The company is developing specific targets for electricity that can be used in both countries but no timeline has been set, showing a lack of confidence in short-term development.
Samsung has also been looking for opportunities around the world to purchase installations to eliminate air pollution and integrate with other types of renewable energy prices. For example, in Brazil and Mexico, the company is planning to achieve 100% renewable energy by 2025.
But human rights activists said Samsung should force governments, for political reasons. In South Korea and Vietnam, the group is the largest recruiter and home-based supplier.
“Given Samsung’s growing business size and its impact on Korea and Vietnam’s economy and its promise to secure power in other markets, it has the potential to advance Korea and Vietnam in the pursuit of renewable energy,” Greenpeace said.
Youn said the “real culprits” in South Korea are the state-run electricity company Korea Electrical Power Corp. and government agencies that have been resisting the electronics market for years.
Seasonal Growth
Where climate change meets business, markets and politics. See the FT publication here.
Interested in claiming natural FT claims? Learn more about our science-based goals here
The tariffs in this country are only about 5%, although new laws allowing direct purchase agreements have been put in place.
“It’s ridiculous, and that makes it very difficult to do any of the most effective ways to increase energy,” Youn said.
Continuing to undermine the company’s claims that Samsung’s corporations – along with Hyundai car manufacturers, Kepco and other South Korean companies and financial institutions – have been around for years. has sat down on the development of coal-fired power in Vietnam.
“On the one hand, they say they want more power for their electronics factory, and on the other hand, they are building unnecessary coal-fired power plants…
Several groups, including Samsung’s financial divisions, last year promised to end coal money.
[ad_2]
Source link
