This is what you should not do, says Girardin: Remove deforestation and plant new trees to reduce emissions. He said: “We provide examples in the cutting-edge-cutting newspapers that you can plant forests to combat certain air pollution,” he said. “It simply came to our notice then. Or the areas where they have been laid off from their livelihood to support themselves, to plant forests in order to get carbon quickly. That doesn’t make sense at all. ”
Twisted prices that could be set up to raise someone’s airports would not work, acknowledges Peter Ellis, director of global science at Nature Conservancy, who did not participate in the paper. But restoring the environment to its natural state can prepare us for survival in the climate change we have made. “Many natural resources promote climate resilience,” says Ellis. “And they provide the basic benefits that people care for, which can help them to spend more time caring for the environment.”
This is very important for you to buy from people who rely on the environment for food and clean water — and to explain the latest benefits, rehabilitation, and not just long-term benefits around the world. Daniela Miteva, an environmentalist at Ohio State University, said: “Unless you talk about the value of water, the high cost of living, and the reduction of malaria, or the things that locals care for, it’s very difficult for people to live in the area.”
Miteva operates natural resources in northern Uganda and Indonesia. (They did not take part in the new project.) Both countries are struggling to cut down trees indiscriminately, but the situation in the region is different, depending on the natural rights of land, for example. For example, the government may provide funds to families for not cutting down a forest, called “environmental fundraising.”
“Unless you’re talking about some of the benefits of carbon dioxide, getting this idea approved by you is very difficult – that’s what I’ve experienced,” says Miteva. “There is also the idea that white people go to the Global South and tell people what to do, all the ideas about carbon monoxide.”
Another problem is that fellow fighters are trying to exploit natural disasters on a populous planet. People living on this earth, we need more places to feed everyone. “There’s a conflict between wanting to protect biodiversity and human health and feeding, and it’s difficult,” says biologist Rich Conant, who studies environmental methods at Colorado State University but has not participated in the new project. “Thankfully, I think, a lot of the places we use polymers are not being used properly, which is why I think there is a lot that can grow food in the world.” This can include methods such as irrigation preparation and various crops to increase yields using the same space.
But it is important to add that people cannot just fix the environment, sit down, and allow the environment to function at all. The same is true of new technologies such as “direct air control,” machines themselves absorbing air from the air and shut down. Here is the danger of climate change: Disruption to our greenhouse gas emissions when we have to do everything we can to cut them off completely – and quickly.
“People feel that ‘don’t worry about humans, nature will save us,'” says Ellis. “That’s the kind of thing that makes me sleep at night. First, we but nature, and we must work together. But we have to put iron on all the rails if we want to pull ourselves together as human beings, with our fellow riders on Spaceship Earth, to get out of the predicament we have set ourselves.
Source link
