[ad_1]
The correspondent is Iran’s deputy foreign minister and negotiator for nuclear weapons
This week, Iran and five other world powers are meeting in Vienna for so-called “nuclear talks”. The same term – used to refer to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) – is full of errors.
The West, especially the US, is working hard to promote “negotiations” as a mere way to curb Iran’s legitimate and peaceful nuclear program, which is contained in international treaties and is overseen by regulatory agencies. From Iran’s point of view, however, the “negotiations” should be based on real intentions, seen by all parties.
In this way, we have two goals: first and foremost, to achieve the full, definite and definite removal of the sanctions imposed on the Iranian people. Without this, the process will continue indefinitely. “Conversation” without a solution is not good for everyone.
The second is to improve Iran’s legal right to benefit from a nuclear nuclear peace treaty, especially the most important industrial enrichment technology, in line with the principles of the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).
Previous attempts to shut down the “interdependence” between the nuclear talks have failed mainly because the West sees any alliance as an established platform that could lead to greater pressure on Iran. In English you call it “moving the goalposts”.
This is the basis of the argument that has forced us, six years after the first agreement, at the table again. We will be starting new talks with the help of the JCPOA disaster, when US President Donald Trump decided to abandon the agreement. This was a terrible betrayal of Iran and Iran.
Experience tells us that the West does not want to establish an alliance. Instead, it seeks to elevate public opinion by declaring one where it “does not fulfill” the agreement in any way. Based on our experience, this is followed by the act of “seizing” the JCPOA platform to force Iran to do more in non-nuclear-related areas. As a result, the Iranian people do not believe in this policy, or its consequences.
It would be absurd to attribute the crisis to Trump’s administration and his “extremely compelling campaign.” The US’s relentless efforts to deny Iran any economic benefits by reducing its nuclear activities are the reason why many former anti-Iran allies have now changed their minds: they no longer trust its tangible benefits or objectives. Donald Trump simply removed the velvet gloves from his hands to a metal bar of the former US administration.
In our opinion, past mistakes should not be repeated. We have, therefore, learned over the past six years who can be trusted. To ensure that any incoming agreement is made of steel, the West must pay the price for failing to fulfill their share of the business. As in any business, cooperation is a partnership, and breaking it has its consequences.
Iran remains committed to the cause and will live up to its promises. In our view, the concept of “succession” may not form the basis for negotiations because it is the US government that has abolished the treaty. So the US must show that it is very important at this time, and that it has the necessary skills to deliver on its promises.
In Iran’s recent presidential election, voters decided to put their trust in ideas that encouraged realism in the West. Actions now are more important than words. We must be provided with a clear and concise approach to ensure that sanctions are lifted. For what other reasons can we agree with Iran’s technological progress and the world’s most valuable nuclear program?
Iran has not succumbed to the use of military threats, economic sanctions or “excessive pressure” under Trump and does not do so under Biden. In order to achieve the freedoms and interests of our country, we are prepared to negotiate fairly and carefully, using the principles of “guarantee” and “guarantee”. This should prioritize compensation for breach of contract, including the removal of all post-JCPOA sanctions.
In retaliation, Iran is ready to voluntarily fulfill its nuclear agreements under a treaty. We are prepared to act on any pressure and reciprocate the favor.
We have made our choice. Now we will see if the Westerners are interested in getting into real talks or not.
[ad_2]
Source link
