World News

Indian court has overturned death sentences for photographer rape | Sexual Harassment

The Supreme Court has reversed the verdict of the murder of three men arrested in connection with the 2013 genocide at Shakti Mills complex in Mumbai.

A court in Mumbai, India has reversed the decision to kill three men found guilty of rape which heightened public outrage over women’s protection in India.

The beatings in 2013 followed another notorious terrorist rape last year that killed a woman in New Delhi, sparking international protests that led to stricter anti-rape laws.

Three men in Mumbai, along with two friends, being raped and raped repeatedly a 22-year-old photographer who was working for a disbanded factory.

Shakti Mills is located near the highest level of apartments, offices, shops and restaurants located in the Indian economy.

Journalists denounce terrorist rape of an Indian photographer, in Jammu, in Kashmir, operated by India. [File: Jaipal Singh/EPA]

The attack upset residents of Mumbai, a city known for its safer sex than the capital of New Delhi, sparking protests in the city and riots in parliament.

Mumbai police have arrested three suspects and their accomplices less than a week after the incident.

The arrest prompted a 19-year-old girl to take action come forward and accused the three of raping her in the same place last month, along with two separate individuals.

All seven accused – two of them juvenile – were convicted of two counts of rape.

The 2012 New Delhi case caused the law to be amended so that repeat offenders were eligible to receive the death penalty.

Three men convicted of all crimes in Mumbai have been sentenced to life in prison, with the first of those sentenced to life imprisonment.

At the time of sentencing, he was 19, 21 and 28 years old.

The High Court in Mumbai pleaded guilty on Thursday but reduced the sentences to life imprisonment without parole.

“Death dispels the idea of ​​repentance,” the judge said, according to the Press Trust of India.

“It cannot be argued that the defendant was liable to the death penalty. He should be sentenced to life imprisonment for his crimes. ”




Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Back to top button