[ad_1]
For more than a week, one YouTube corner where Kazakh protesters and human rights activists in Xinjiang are regularly featured.
On June 15, a YouTube video of “Atajurt Kazakh Human Rights” was disrupted, and the videos were replaced with the obscure word “suspended for violating YouTube’s rules.” A few days later, the procedure was resumed without public comment. Then, a few days later, the first 12 movies of the movie disappeared from the crowd.
Atajurt captures and distributes video recordings from its relatives who were detained in Chinese camps in Xinjiang. To ensure the accuracy of the videos, each evidence in the community provides evidence of the witness and his or her imprisoned relatives. It also describes the organisation’s loyalty, says Serikzhan Bilash, Kazakh freedom fighters and their owners.
Accuracy is especially important not only because of the lack of knowledge in Xinjiang, but also because the evidence is often met with opposition from supporters of the China Communist Party – who, Bilash says, want any reason to deny the so-called United Nationsviolation of human rights”In this section.
Published by Atajurt, the content of the videos is then used by other organizations such as Human Rights Watch and Xinjiang Experimental Database, which describes where arrests take place, the worst affected areas, and the missing persons. A representative at the Xinjiang Victims Database told MIT Technology Review that their work was linked to Atajurt movies “several times.”
For years, these videos – which come until 2018 – have never been a problem, perhaps according to YouTube’s opinion. That changed last week.
“Review”
“We have complex policies which prevents harassment on YouTube, including doxing, “a YouTube spokesman told MIT Technology Review on Friday, adding,” We welcome the efforts to document the most important human rights cases around the world. We have them too process which does not allow the methods to be published More to Learn in order to avoid persecution. ”
He was probably referring to the display of Atajurt documents, which he used to prove the facts of human testimony.
However, shortly after MIT Technology Review sent YouTube a list of questions about the June 15 removal, as well as its key review points, YouTube changed its mind. “After careful research of the video,” returned the page, “with a warning,” a company representative wrote in an email. “We are … working with the agency to remove any known content from their videos in order to restore them.”
[ad_2]
Source link
