Tech News

Here is what China wants from its next location


The Tianhe-1 phase that started this week is the culmination of what should be a three-phase work phase. At the top, it looks pale compared to the 22-year-old ISS. The ISS is a behemoth weighing about 420 tons, while the smallest T-Chinese Space Station (CSS) will be only 80 to 100 tons, close in size and space. formerly it was Mir of Russia. The Tianhe-1 section is only 22 tons and 16.6 meters long. And after 12 missions this year and the next for all things to be done, the completed station will remain half the length of the ISS.

China looks good with this. “We did not want to compete with the ISS based on size,” said Gu Yidong, senior scientist of China’s human research program, said Scientific American.

And that doesn’t mean the site can’t boast of some useful features. Tianhe will be home to all the ships in which they live, and the next two sections, Wentian and Mengtian, will support a variety of scientific experiments based on the decline of the home. They are able to study the effects of liquid water as well as the changes in phases, for example, or the growth and evolution of living things.

There will be 14 experiments on the inside of the station, with another 50 test stands that can be climbed outside to observe the celestial bodies. China has already reached out to its partners around the world to request a trial. The five port and many hand-held ports will ensure the smooth running of other flights and create opportunities to expand the station.

More interestingly, the space will play a key role in helping China develop and use a new space telescope, the Xuntian, aimed at combating NASA’s old Hubble Space Telescope, which has a 300-dimensional viewing unit and a similar concept. It will look in ultraviolet light and visible, conducting research related to the dark circles and the forces of blackness, cosmology, galactic evolution, and the realization of near objects. Designed for launch in 2024, Xuntian is able to upgrade the port with CSS for easy maintenance and redesign.

In addition, the site could serve as a testing ground for technologies that will be needed to sustain the moon and Mars one day. These include residential areas with life-support systems, solar energy, and protection from radiation and micrometeorite.

All of this is hygienic, but as Lincoln Hines University of Cornell points out, the real purpose of the site seems to be celebrity — placing China as part of aerospace clubs based in a circular area, and promoting nationalism within its borders. “I have no doubt that there are Chinese scientists who are excited about what they can do through CSS,” says Hines. “But in line with the government’s idea of ​​contributing to this huge project, it is a strong signal that allows China to tell its people, ‘We have a talented team and we can compete with the United States.'”

And it also puts China at a disadvantage over competing with the US in “soft power.” The US is the largest contributor to the ISS, the best in the world that benefits the world. It contributes to the achievement of an exciting experiment in science and technology, but the implications for the region have long been a reflection of globalization.

We can expect the CSS to provide an opportunity for dialogue in China to help strengthen international relations with other countries – especially at a time when the country is being closely monitored for human rights abuses against the Uyghurs, political opponents, and Hong Kong Democrats.

“China’s work is new and exciting,” Goswami said, as the future of the ISS is uncertain. “It shows the world that China is openly opposed to the US to lead the air, and that it is a partner.

While these benefits are not met, they may not change much in China. Unlike U.S. government officials, the China Communist Party does not have to provide reasons for the birth of its citizens.

“In my opinion, the Chinese government’s first goal is to survive,” Hines said. “As a result, the work is more closely aligned with domestic needs, even if they are politically incorrect or will benefit scientists.”


Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Back to top button