[ad_1]
Google Week Against Distrust push back arrived at the right end on Friday when the company wrote a to walk releasing large portions of antitrust case provided by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and international cooperation. Among other things, new complaint released last week criticized Google for collaborating with Facebook (now Meta) to provide unfair interest on Google’s advertising campaign as part of a project called “Jedi Blue.” Facebook, as part of the quid pro quo, has agreed to abandon its advertising plans. Complaints have even reached that Google Sundar Photosi and Mark Zuckerberg of Meta and Sheryl Sandberg have both signed the agreement.
This is not how Google views it. In the move, Google said the countries failed to prove they had participated in the anti-competition campaign. Instead, the company described the models provided in the complaints as “collection of complaints”. Instead, if the states had their way, Google says, then, the search giant would be compelled, “to share with competitors the economic benefits and skills.” Google has continued to refute some of the claims that countries’ writing expired years ago, making the claims unnecessary.
“State Plaintiffs’ complaints – favored by a few Google fighters who have failed to invest properly, compete effectively, or constantly innovate – could meet the demands of their competitors,” Google wrote. “It also threatens to undermine the power that enables Google and other companies to deliver the things that businesses and consumers rely on on a daily basis.”
Adam Cohen, Google’s Director of Economic Policy, released the blog post giving details of the decision of the decision-making company. In it, Cohen criticized Paxton for allegedly “misleading and misleading,” which misrepresents Google’s business, business, and goals. Cohen refuted a number of allegations that Paxton complained about, especially those that occurred as a result of Facebook’s affiliation.
Google says this publicly he announced Facebook Audience Network’s (FAN) participation in its Open Bidding program, (along with at least 25 others) is back in 2018. Instead of competing with the competition, Google argued that Facebook’s participation was beneficial to both advertisers and publishers.
“Instead,” Cohen wrote, “if FAN were not part of Open Bidding, AG Paxton would probably be preventing our enemy from getting our stuff and meeting other printers.”
Finally, Cohen reiterated Google’s view that it did not give Facebook more opportunities than its competitors, “FAN [Facebook] he competes with them in marketing as well as with other advertisers. “
As mentioned above, Google’s move comes within a week of strong advocacy against some unconstitutional laws. effort they are going their way through Congress. Google has challenged the American Innovation and Choice Online Act, which, if enacted, could prevent large internet companies from unfairly liking their products and services on their platforms. Sometimes, CEO of Google Sundar Photosi he says joined several lawmakers in urging them to oppose the law. In the end, those attempts failed. On Thursday, the Senate Judiciary Committee voted overwhelmingly (16-6) in favor of the bill.
[ad_2]
Source link
