[ad_1]
Like the US is preparing for the mid-term elections next year, as well as the execution of both online and external online lies and potential lies, it is necessary to establish a moral and legitimate security for groups especially those who would be pressured by digital campaigns. When the time is right, we need to develop a new democratic internet management system in order to protect the various people affected by the crisis in the air.
For the past two years Lab Publishing Research at the Center for Media Engagement in UT Austin has been studying the ways in which various global producers of social media look at their approaches. One of the main features of the US lab is that these people – working for a number of parties, local and foreign governments, political parties, and PR groups – often use several platforms such as WhatsApp and Telegram and other open platforms such as Facebook and YouTube for trial groups. a minority of voters in a region or city. For example, we have found that they are interested in spreading political lies among themselves immigrants and immigrants in Florida, North Carolina, and other high-altitude countries.
While some of this comes from US parties hoping to cast a single vote, much has been done. shit and not necessarily for clear purposes. It is not uncommon, for example, to encounter material that compares or appears to be from users in China, Venezuela, Russia, or India, and some of which contain state-of-the-art certification in those countries.
This is probably not surprising considering what we now know about leanings Outside bid political influence in the United States and various other countries around the world. China and Russia continue to monitor Big Tech and, similarly, their online experiences. And, of course, our lab has found compelling evidence that U.S. citizens with Chinese heritage – especially immigrants especially the second generation – are being monitored by popular digital video systems with similar systems in Beijing. We’ve seen suspicious media reports (several thousand Twitter afterwards removed) use anti-US and anti-democratic issues — and pro-Bejing proponents of the assassination of George Floyd, the Capitol insurgency, protests in Hong Kong, and other important events. In our questionnaire and digital research around the 2020 US presidential election we met people from Arab, Columbian, Brazil, and Indian following them as well. We also spoke to journalists who were open about trying to harass large numbers of people, refugees, and minorities, falsely claiming that Joe Biden was a socialist and that they should not be helping him.
While the powers of China, Russia, or other dictatorships are on the rise of them only “rural” internets it has been widely reported, the existence of false government campaigns is also evident in a paradoxical manner. This applies to areas that are connected to countries living elsewhere – including here in the US – as well as countries looking to these undemocratic regimes to figure out how to manage (or improve) their digital information space.
Russia, China, and other sovereign states are at the forefront of their internet presence, which is based on the principles of autonomy, control, and freedom of expression. These oversight campaigns have sprung up in other information centers around the world. For example, a study from the Slovakian thinktank GLOBSEC found Kremlin powers in the natural habitats of several EU countries. He argues that Russia’s unpredictable and inaccurate ideology undermines the government’s perceptions of the government and, ultimately, undermines European democracy.
However, democracies have failed to dominate by trying to select and regulate the internet. After many years of believing that the technical sector can and should do so watch out The same, which has resulted in a coup d’etat against the Capitol, the policy makers of the world and the rest of the participants are now questioning what the social media network should look like.
If Biden’s management wants to make the best of them new dedication Transatlantic integration, digital management needs to be centralized. As autonomous nations develop and establish their own power, democracies need to be worked on, and with urgency. While the EU has led efforts to protect the individual confidential freedom and war of attrition Hypocrisy with hate speech online, the job is not over. Even legal attempts such as Electrical Services and rules on artificial intelligence it would not be possible, the EU or US would not be able to do this alone. Democrats grow in strong alliances, and risk can disappear without them.
We need a new blueprint for online democracy. This is something that has never happened because our organizations have no legal or partial knowledge of what can happen used as a template electronic experiments. For example, events created by the digital revolution challenge our understanding of human rights and compel us to redefine their rights in the 21st century. What does freedom of speech mean? just luck to an audience that uses thousands of users? What about vulnerable users? Are we fully protecting our privacy rights on the Internet — a place where various suspicious organizations continue to follow our actions? Explaining the answers to these and other questions, coercion will not be difficult, especially since finding answers requires cooperation between the participants in the discussion: citizens / users, government officials, government agencies, students, and, in particular, the technical.
[ad_2]
Source link
