[ad_1]
Earlier this week, Officials in France he criticized the four former supervisors of Nexa Technologies, formerly known as Amesys, for harassment and war crimes. Between 2007 and 2014, the company is said to have provided control equipment to dictatorial regimes in Libya and Egypt.
The coalition with the Interational Federation for Human Rights, the Cairo Institute for Human Rights Study, and other human rights groups say that Libyan dictatorial regimes Moammar Gadhafi and Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi used their weapons to identify their opponents as well as human rights activists, read their confidential emails and messages, and, in some cases, kidnap, torture, or kill them.
Nexa’s supervisors are accused of selling internet monitoring tools who received emails, notes, and Facebook messages from journalists and critics. Staff he says he sells technology in Gadhafi’s government in Libya in 2007 and Egypt in 2014. The the defendants include former Amesys president Philippe Vannier, former President Stéphane Salies, and two Nexa leaders: President Olivier Bohbot and executive director Renaud Roques. Efforts to reach the men through Nexa were unsuccessful.
The human rights judge and the Paris Judicial Court have ruled in his favor see also evidence to determine whether the four prosecutors had been tried in a court of law.
Such objections are very limited. National security experts say the global markets for the sale of surveillance weapons are not being run. Manufacturers of such devices often insist on restrictions, even those that are designed to prevent misuse. A 2017 effort from European journalists it is estimated that there were more than 230 companies living in the EU.
“In general, there is little that governments need to do to address this volatile market,” said Marietje Schaake, director of international policy at the Cyber Policy Center in Stanford and a former member of the European Parliament. While in parliament, Schaake assisted new restrictions on exports of cyber technology from Europe to countries with a history of human rights violations.
Launched by EU legislators in 2016 and gone last year, the new rules require companies to obtain licenses to export certain technologies, “such as programs that can monitor, steal, or obtain data. Governments reviewing licensing applications must assess whether their equipment could infringe on human rights.
The criticism of French regulators stems from sales that were followed by new EU regulations, but Schaake hopes to send a message that it is possible to establish restrictions on online monitoring tools. He also said it was easy to regulate trade before it was exported. In many cases, it is the Western world that strongly opposes this idea.
“Companies are developing these weapons as anti-terrorism weapons,” says Schaake. “Those responsible for harassing or kidnapping government officials are the ones who are doing this, but the companies are providing the necessary equipment to make this possible.”
The crisis in trade in Libya and Egypt comes from the “Arab year” of 2011, when journalists and secret groups raises alarms US and European companies management tools to oppressive governments.
In the US and EU, foreign direct investment has changed in fashion, and security agencies say terrestrial restrictions may punish research, crime, or the use of software by human rights groups emphasizing their potential in establishing authoritarian rule.
He apparently came to the US has changed its own rules direct delivery of malicious software. The Department of Commerce has said it will take away human rights time thinking accepting or rejecting licenses for companies to create global sales. As in the EU, change is coming after ordering a few failed attempts remodeling. But that means, in fact, it is still in the air.
“You need to consider this in light of the growing number of human rights abuses in Europe and the US and the growing interest in the human rights violations in China and elsewhere,” said Garrett Hinck, a national security analyst. at the University University.
[ad_2]
Source link
