[ad_1]
While Google pushed the R&D switch to shipment, it still seems to be developing the wrong technology. In early 2010, solar competition was seen as a strong competition in the middle solar photovoltaic (PV) and Constant power supply (CSP), which uses hot water and solar to drive an electric motor. Google has actively invested more than $ 1 billion in companies and innovative products, including major investments in CSP BrightSource Energy and eSolar apparel. Ten years later, these options do not look good, as CSP, too, is failing due to lower PV prices.
Google is not the only one that has repeatedly thought about the decline in cell prices in recent years and how it thinks about clean energy. The price of PV solar panels has fallen by almost 10 in the last decade, on top of an impressive rate that had dropped to the present level, a sharp drop by almost a hundred since US President Jimmy Carter demolished window panels in the White House in 1979. (Ronald Reagan lowered them in 1986, during his second term as president.)
To put it bluntly, if oil also fell in price since the 1979 rate, it could pay pensions today. Obviously, oil, and essential, prices are changing for a number of technical, economic, and political reasons. Solar PV prices are also driven by all of these factors, but over the years, technology has ruled well. (This year, prices for solar PV modules have grown around 18% due to a temporary decline in sales of silicon.)
In his most recent year Energy Display, The International Energy Agency has declared solar PV to be “the cheapest resource in all of human history” in a relatively low-cost solar system. Both qualifications are essential. The sun is certain – the sun will always be cheaper in Phoenix, Arizona, than in New York City – but the report confirmed that the sun is now cheaper than coal and natural gas in many places.
The sun must be very low which makes it costly to build new solar power and the coal and gas-fired power plants are still making money for their owners.
Money is essential for this to be true. Solar PV and other renewable energy sources such as wind turbines have low or close to use – front-end investment has been a major obstacle, and investment has been a major factor. Thanks to the various governmental initiatives, solar trading has been a challenge in the last decade, releasing cheap money.
As a result, solar exports of PV grew rapidly; is the fastest growing power source in the world, and the figures are yet to come. It originates in low-energy areas, however, far behind coal, gas, hydro, nuclear-even wind, which has been cheap for a long time. And in that there is a very serious problem with solar PV. It may be the cheapest type of electricity for many, but this alone does not make the white energy change much faster.
We need to make advances in technology. Why not stop at grid parity, where it is cheaper to build and use solar PV to provide electricity through archaeological sources? Why not less than 10%? Why not try to reduce your spending by one-tenth of something in ten years? Such drops are needed because the purpose of the grid cleaning is misleading – the real question is how the requirements should leave the existing coal and replace it with the sun, instead of just avoiding adding new coal power. The sun must be very low which makes it costly to build new solar power and the coal and gas-fired power plants are still making money for their owners.
All that is needed is the principles to enforce existing solar technology and to support R&D in new technologies. The entire package includes technical research, development, demonstration, deployment, and dissemination. Every step that needs to be done needs the support of the government, knowing that it is also very cheap to travel.
How to make cheap
In order to be more efficient in achieving affordable solar energy, it is important to understand why the cost of renewable energy has declined over the past few decades.
MIT electrical scientist Alireza and his team has found that the dramatic decline in solar cells over a 30-year period can be attributed to three factors: R&D leading to improved efficiency (increasing the amount of sunlight converted into electricity) and other advanced technologies; economics depending on the size of the solar cell space and the amount of inputs such as silicon; and the transformation that results from learning in practice.
Nothing could be further from the truth, but one thing is certain: The offerings made by each person vary from time to time. From 1980 to 2000, R&D made up about 60% of the low prices, while the bulk wealth came in at 20%, with learning by doing a third third of the lowest price; some of the items that cannot be provided make money. This is understandable; it was a time of incredible advances in solar cells but it was not the time to make and send more. Since then, the pendulum has swung from R&D to a major technological shift to the manufacturing economy, accounting for more than 40% of prices. It is important to note, however, that research advances remain 40% lower.
A study of futures trading that makes the sun more affordable: there should be direct support for all three, economic interventions. Trancik’s findings are based on a portion of the PV itself. This stops installing, grid connections, and other things that make all the money. These are developed areas for professionals and companies to become more knowledgeable. Although the consequences of receiving additional PVs appear to be mixed, factors such as food prices, which provide long-term contracts for solar PV manufacturers, and increased history or clean electricity standards, which set the amount of renewable time, reflect the effects of full operation.
There is no free lunch
Even with the decline of the sun, switching to extras will be more expensive. The big question, of course, is how cheap it is compared to what – climate change, too, comes at a price. Cheap solar also attracts investors as economic and natural gas emissions are considered.
Much here depends on the cost of carbon dioxide (SCC), the amount of waste that can be spent on a ton of carbon dioxide emitted today on the economy, people, and the environment – and in addition, every ton of CO2 emissions should pay off. It’s a number that explains more about the real value of coal and other fuels — as well as about the proper support of solar PV and other supplements.
[ad_2]
Source link
