[ad_1]
The official corporate claims are often confusing hokum and gibberish. When the former parent company Financial Times began to “perform well” as one of its best intentions, the opposition chamber, which doubted the merits of the election, went on strike for several days.
A new research of the 525 companies of the largest companies in the world supported by AMO confirming that my former bosses are not the only ones who are interested in vague terms.
Loyalty, skill, respect, responsibility and trustworthiness have surpassed the list of popular items, as we have reported in the annual reports for the past two years. Some companies even choose to be happy.
I think their popularity is due to the fact that they are very difficult to measure. Integrity guarantees that the company intends to adhere to its principles without compromising its principles. Respect and responsibility ask the question “to whom and what”. And the definition of stability has become so complete that the EU has recently passed a new law on the establishment of a labor force system group.
It is difficult not to win some of the other options: approach, action and legal security. And the difference is the difference between PepsiCo’s chosen job and “Make A Big Smile”With staff boycott the 12-hour rotation penalty at his Frito-Lay plant in Topeka, Kansas.
Going beyond the buzzwords, this study shows that Covid-19 as well as demonstrations that took place during the summer about racism affected. AMO ranked approximately 2,300 of each category in categories and found a change in promotion. “People and organization” is now at the forefront of the list, with “practices and integrity” and “skills and expertise” reviving.
“We are also discovering human meaning,” says Charles Fleming, who oversees the study. “I’m changing from material and greedy – to my company, my colleagues, my clients – to a global perspective.”
Or to be funny, is what company executives think their customers, co-workers and fundraisers want to hear. It reminds me of Groucho Marx’s words: “These are my principles, and if you do not like them… I have others.”
Although U.S. companies have recently been pressured to end discrimination following the Black Lives Matter protests, the transition was not just an event in America. The AMO study found that one in five major factors changed in each market and in all the components surveyed. The only exception was Germany, where the top five principles did not change, with status and stability at the top.
That inconsistency is a problem. André Spicer, professor of corporate ethics who is also helping to establish the principles of Cass Business School. “Good behavior depends on what the company does, what it profits, and what penalties it does.”
A study led by Donald Sull of MIT Last year they found no connection between the government’s actions and the way US companies adhere to the rules of their employers.
However, Amelia Miazad, University of California, Berkeley, professor of law, says doubts about the mission statement are wrong. He learned about the capitalism of the stakeholders and the six-year-olds and found that corporate decisions affect systems over time.
“It’s the first part. When companies speak, both the participants and the funders are held accountable, “he said. customers may want that the companies have expressed their views on the right to vote.
Recently, the SOC Investment Group, which works with the union’s pension funds, has asked 10 US companies to adhere to their terms of reference and an independent evaluation of how they operate differently between nations. BlackRock and Morgan Stanley teamed up. The other eight refused, which is why the SOC demanded a shareholder vote that won 44% in the Amazon and 40% on JPMorgan, while senior Jamie Dimon was “amazing”took the knee“In the wake of last year’s protests over the killing of George Floyd police.
“There has been a real test in the industry,” says Dieter Waizenegger, chief executive officer of the group. “These words really mean your customers and those who share them.” The SOC is planning to seek re-evaluation next year, and hopes to get some support from investors like BlackRock.
Just think of the changes that would make a company’s policy if companies knew they had to follow it.
[ad_2]
Source link
