Tech News

Blue water thinking | MIT Technology Review

[ad_1]

The names of many new companies and technologies designed to address the challenges of climate change in the marine ecosystem can inspire maritime activity. WaveKiller they use compressed air machines to form “walls” of bubbles up to 50 feet long, to prevent erosion and to contain debris and oil. The program of first and a solar-powered boat operated by the Dutch Ocean Ocean non-governmental organization in the Southeast Asian rivers to collect more waste before reaching the sea. dodomanda and ZinyalalaShark design and deploy autonomous drones to navigate the oceans, collecting climates and past and present waste.

The technological model (often referred to as a threat) represents more and more ways to combat water pollution — the need for climate change, as climate change threatens the health of the world’s oceans. The release of air is the heating of air and water, which dissolves ice ice at such a rapid rate NASA estimates of global sea level rise an average of about one centimeter each year through 2100.

In the face of global warming, rising sea levels are critical to global stability, but two are more complex. One is the coastal habitat: as the world’s beaches become less and more degraded, the homes and livelihoods of one third of the world’s coastal population may have changed dramatically in this generation. The second is world food. Looking at the economic downturn caused by the global covid-19 epidemic, the rapid growth in global trade and the use of protein has boosted water flow and increased commercial growth.

Growing consumer demand and the failure of the system and recycling of solid waste also adds 8 million tons of plastic to 150 million tons in our oceans today, according to Sea Conservation. Plastic waste is a current problem – affecting a wide range of industries from water to tourism – as well as long-term hazards to the world, as sea waves turn plastic waste into microplastics that enter the food chain. This is one area where a great history of technical support is being raised in response, from the already mentioned walls of foam and garbage dumps, to the establishment of new polymers dissolved in seawater, monitoring information and awareness on marine commercial applications through AI-assisted sensors and analytics.

But more – sending more technology, more innovation, more control and government control – is needed to reduce the rise of marine plastics, as well as other major threats to the world’s oceans.

In this regard, MIT Technology Review Insights, a traditional division of MIT Technology Review, is launching a global study to see how new “blue economy” technologies and solutions are being used to clean up our oceans, reduce ocean-related emissions, and increase stability. maritime industries. The project will culminate in the release of the “Blue Technology Barometer,” which will outline the middle ground of the global economy and its technologies and solutions are being developed and used effectively to address challenges ranging from carbon emissions in ports and ports to tackling illegal, unspecified, and unchanged.

The Barometer will monitor these efforts in more than 50 coastal countries and regions around the world, and measure them based on a broad-based economic model and predictability from multiple sources. The method and research will be based on the work done by MIT Technology Review Insights Green Future List– our global foundation for the promotion of decarbonization and its potential – and will play a key role in enhancing our reputation for research that examines how technology works to promote sustainable development.

The Barometer also examines global efforts to utilize technologies, operations, and business responses that have addressed climate change and are being sent to restore marine and atmospheric damage. In testing this connection of ideas and innovations, Barometer wants to highlight which coastal economies are working best to ensure that tomorrow is blue.

This was created by Insights, the hand of material contained in the MIT Technology Review. It was not written by the authors of the MIT Technology Review.

[ad_2]

Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Back to top button