[ad_1]
Apple has been forced to work closely with its rivals in Silicon Valley to address the threat of job security expertise, with reports that the NSO spy Pegasus was used to target journalists and human rights activists.
Amnesty International, which analyzed most phones led by NSO clients, says Apple’s advertising of security tools and its privacy tools was “hampered” by the difficult availability even in the most recent versions of iPhones and iOS software.
“Thousands of iPhones could be lost,” said Danna Ingleton, Amnesty’s deputy director. “It’s a global problem – everyone and everyone is at risk, and even the most powerful giants like Apple are not able to cope with the impending surveillance.”
Security analysts say Apple can do more to address this problem by working with other technology companies to report potential problems and monitor their apps.
“Unfortunately, Apple does not do the job well,” said Aaron Cockerill, a Lookout assistant manager, a mobile security provider, describing iOS as a “black box” compared to Google’s Google, whereas “it’s easier to identify what’s wrong.”
Forgiveness worked with unprofitable journalism Prohibited Matters and 17 media assistants on the “Pegasus Project” to determine what they say is being monitored.
The NSO, which claims that its expertise was designed to target only those suspected or terrorists, has described what the Pegasus Project described as “false” and “full of misconceptions and misconceptions”.
Forgiveness research found that repeated attempts to steal data and extract text on iPhones were made via Apple’s iMessage using tools called “zero-click”, which work without the user having to connect.
Bill Marczak, a researcher at Citizen Lab, a nonprofit group that has written extensively on NSO strategies, says Amnesty’s findings suggest that Apple had a “major red-light problem of five alarms and iMessage security”.
A similar type of “zero-click” Pegasus attack was known using Facebook messenger Facebook in 2019.
Did Cathcart, the head of WhatsApp, call the latest release a “resumption of online security”. In a series of tweets, he outlined steps from technology companies including Google, Microsoft and Cisco that seek retaliation against Pegasus and other marketing tools.
But Apple, with whom Facebook has long debated regarding iPhone privacy, was not on the list of affiliates.
“We want more companies, and, more seriously, governments, to take action to hold the NSO accountable,” Cathcart said. He said.
While Apple does a “great job of protecting consumers”, says Lookout’s Cockerill, “it has to be very cooperative with companies like mine” to protect against risks such as Pegasus.
“The big difference between Apple and Google is obvious,” Cockerill said.
Apple insisted it cooperated with foreign investigators, but chose not to announce what had happened. This includes paying millions of dollars a year for the benefits of “extra protection” in the face of adversity and providing its tools to researchers.
“For more than a decade, Apple has led these companies in developing new security systems, hence, security analysts acceptance The iPhone is the most secure security device on the market, ”Apple said in a statement.
“The attacks like the one mentioned are very advanced, costing millions of dollars to make, often last a long time, and are used to fight against other people,” Apple added. “While this does not mean that it does not threaten many of our users, we continue to work hard to protect all of our customers, and we are only adding new security to their devices and information.”
[ad_2]
Source link
