When we look at posts that fill inboxes and tweets that illuminate my time, no one is enjoying Facebook right now. On Friday, the company released the answer to the Facebook Oversight Board’s comments on Donald Trump’s permanent ban. We learned that Trump’s account is now reserved for two years from the date of the suspension on January 7, when Facebook will review the risks of reinstating him. The answer also involves a change in several other systems. Opinions on this announcement are based on the implication that they are “nonsense”.theater response”That showing that he is cowardly and careless. Republicans are angry that Trump has not been reinstated.
I admit that I found myself in another camp. The Oversight Board is doing an important job, albeit a very small one, and that’s what Trump is showing why.
When the commission published its ruling last month, it issued a coercive order – Facebook must explain what will happen to Donald Trump’s account, and could not continue indefinitely – as well as coercive proposals, especially for the platform to deviate from its political rhetoric. otherwise and do not follow the rules that apply to everyone. Like me he wrote at the time, Facebook’s response to the non-constructive section was probably the most important one. It could work much more than just signing a Trump account, and it shows if the company is willing to follow the advice of the Oversight Board even though it shouldn’t.
Now we know that the answer to that last question is yes. In a statement Friday, Facebook reportedly offered to follow 15 non-compulsory views. Of the remaining four, they reject one, follow a little one, and do more research.
The most interesting thing is about “money to pay for the news.” Facebook says it will keep them out of favor, meaning they will still be able to provide certain features that violate their Code of Conduct to be effective if they are “advanced or publicly important.” The difference is that the platform will no longer use political writings as fiction rather than anyone else’s writings. It also enhances transparency by creating a descriptive page of the policy; from next year, it is said that it will publish the information at any time unless the materials used are removed.
Let it go in a moment: Facebook has received a series of responses from a group of smart critics and Mark Zuckerberg signed on a concrete change, including a public appearance. This is my progress!
Now, please do not confuse this with full acceptance. There are a lot of criticisms of Facebook advertising. At Trump’s ban, as the company details details of “increasing sanctions against civilians in the wake of civil unrest and violence,” the two-year suspension seems unlikely to allow Trump to return to the platform as he prepares to run for president. And Facebook’s new commitment to transparency ceases to be even more important. Zake new explanation of permission to allow newspapers, for example, provides zero notification of how Facebook defines “loyalty” in the first place – the most important detail. Perhaps the details of the letters starting next year will shed more light, but until then the rules will be as clear as a toilet window.
Its facts, like any announcement from Facebook, cannot be fully articulated until we see how the company works. On several occasions, Facebook says it is already following the Board of Oversight’s recommendations. This can lead to distrust. For example, in response to the idea that it relies on linguistic and political expertise in establishing global policy, the company said, “We are making sure that sponsors are supported by professional and linguistic groups, including the way they speak.” research published this week found that anti-gay propaganda campaigns, which Facebook rules prohibit, continue to spread in Arab countries, “where experts send to millions of their followers through authenticated accounts.” As a very gentle scholar Evelyn Douek he puts it, with its many words, “Facebook gives itself a gold star but crosses boundaries.”
Source link
